PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12500469

Developing dialysis facility-specific performance measures for public reporting.

Pamela R Frederick·Naomi L Maxey·Steven B Clauser·Jonathan R Sugarman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 directed CMS to implement a system to measure and report the quality of dialysis services under Medicare by 2000. Because of this tight timeframe, a rapid-cycle measurement development process was initiated to develop dialysis facility-specific measures that could be released to the public. The result was "Dialysis Facility Compare" which has served as a template for the development of public reporting initiatives for other providers in the Medicare Program. This article describes the process used for developing and reporting these performance measures and the lessons learned for future work in this area.

Explore related subjects

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesBenchmarkingCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Hemodialysis Units, HospitalHumansInformation DisseminationInternetMedicarePublic RelationsQuality Indicators, Health CareRenal DialysisUnited StatesComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pamela R Frederick, Naomi L Maxey, Steven B Clauser, Jonathan R Sugarman. 2002. Developing dialysis facility-specific performance measures for public reporting.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12500469/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that better outcomes are achieved when anticoagulation is managed by anticoagulation clinics rather than by family physicians. We carried out a randomized controlled trial to evaluate these 2 models of anticoagulant care. METHODS: We randomly allocated patients who were expected to require warfarin sodium for 3 months either to anticoagulation clinics located in 3 Canadian tertiary hospitals or to their family physician practices. We evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by comparing the proportion of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) of patients receiving warfarin sodium was within the target therapeutic range +/- 0.2 INR units (expanded therapeutic range) while they were managed in anticoagulation clinics as opposed to family physicians' care over 3 months. We measured the rates of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events and patient satisfaction in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of the 221 patients enrolled, 112 were randomly assigned to anticoagulation clinics and 109 to family physicians. The INR values of patients who were managed by anticoagulation clinics were within the expanded therapeutic range 82% of the time versus 76% of the time for those managed by family physicians (p = 0.034). High-risk INR values (defined as being < 1.5 or > 5.0) were more commonly observed in patients managed by family physicians (40%) than in patients managed by anticoagulation clinics (30%, p = 0.005). More INR measurements were performed by family physicians than by anticoagulation clinics (13 v. 11, p = 0.001). Major bleeding events (2 [2%] v. 1 [1%]), thromboembolic events (1 [1%] v. 2 [2%]) and deaths (5 [4%] v. 6 [6%]) occurred at a similar frequency in the anticoagulation clinic and family physician groups respectively. Of the 170 (77%) patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, more were satisfied when their anticoagulant management was managed through anticoagulation clinics than by their family physicians (p = 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Anticoagulation clinics provided better oral anticoagulant management than family physicians, but the differences were relatively modest.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed2003

Telemedicine. Straight to video.

Videoconference sessions involving patient, GP and hospital consultant have speeded up assessment and reduced the need for referrals. The health centre claims there is potential for a 75 per cent cut in outpatient clinic appointments. The system currently covers cardiology and peripheral vascular disease in one GP practice but research is planned on extending it across the primary care trust.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗