PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12507959

Windows to the ward: graphically oriented report forms. Presentation of complex, interrelated laboratory data for electrophoresis/immunofixation, cerebrospinal fluid, and urinary protein profiles.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated laboratory analyzers that mass produce data have been linked to information systems for more than two decades, but little progress has been made in developing more comprehensible report forms. Results are still reported in computer-generated printouts containing hundreds of numbers crowded into columns on each printed page. METHODS: We developed three software applications focusing on the graphic presentation of laboratory results. RESULTS: The first application summarizes data for a patient with a monoclonal gammopathy. The report provides a cumulative graphic presentation of immunofixation/electrophoresis data without any additional interpretation, focuses on a color-coded electrophoresis scan, and records up to 5 years on a single page. The second application deals with cerebrospinal fluid analysis. The report calculates relevant data and graphs the complex relationship between albumin and immunoglobulin results from paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples. Manually added interpretive text assures an output comprehensible to clinicians in all specialties. The third application produces a report summarizing quantitatively measured urinary marker protein profiles. The report form is generated by a flexible, completely user-definable knowledge-based system. It calculates numerous ratios and formulae, supports reflex testing, supplies an automated interpretation, and generates a specific graphic signature pattern of the results (MDI LabLink proteinuria differentiation). CONCLUSIONS: Increased clinical demand for graphically oriented report forms 5 years after their introduction has provided evidence that these reports transfer complex laboratory data and results to the clinician more effectively. The highest (more than threefold) increase in demand has been for reports for urinary marker protein profiles that feature a largely self-explanatory graphic signature pattern.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Axel Regeniter, Jürg U Steiger, André Scholer, Peter R Huber, Werner H Siede. 2003. Windows to the ward: graphically oriented report forms. Presentation of complex, interrelated laboratory data for electrophoresis/immunofixation, cerebrospinal fluid, and urinary protein profiles.. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.41

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Use of the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer for rapid and reproducible molecular typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis is an economic and fast technique for molecular typing but has the drawback of difficulties in accurately sizing DNA fragments and comparing banding patterns on agarose gels. We aimed to improve RFLP for typing of the important human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae and to compare the results with the commonly used typing techniques of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. We designed primers to amplify a noncoding region adjacent to the pneumolysin gene. The PCR product was digested separately with six restriction endonucleases, and the DNA fragments were analyzed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer for accurate sizing. The combined RFLP results for all enzymes allowed us to assign each of the 47 clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae tested to one of 33 RFLP types. RFLP analyzed using the bioanalyzer allowed discrimination between strains similar to that obtained by the more commonly used techniques of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, which discriminated between 34 types, and multilocus sequence typing, which discriminated between 35 types, but more quickly and with less expense. RFLP of a noncoding region using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer could be a useful addition to the molecular typing techniques in current use for S. pneumoniae, especially as a first screen of a local population.

Autoanalysis↗

A three-armed trial of the ThinPrep Imaging System.

We compared the performance of the ThinPrep (TP) Imaging System (TIS) with manual reading of TP slides (TPM) and with manual reading of the paired conventional Pap smear (PS) in terms of sensitivity for and positive predictive value (PPV) of high-grade disease and productivity. The study consisted of 11,416 routine PS and paired TP slides as well as 103 confirmed abnormal TP slides. In terms of sensitivity for the detection of biopsy-confirmed high-grade disease, overall there was no statistically significant difference between TIS-screened TP (TPI) and TPM (81.1% vs. 86.8%). For the routine cases, TPI was significantly more sensitive than PS (73.4% vs. 57.8%). In terms of PPVs for the cytologic prediction of high-grade disease, there was no statistically, significant difference among TPI, TPM, and PS (75.6%, 73.9%, and 84.6%). For cytologic reports of possible high-grade disease, the PPVs were equivalent for TPI (45.0%) and TPM (37.0%) and there was no significant difference in PPVs between TPI and PS (61.3%). For TP slides, TIS screening showed a 27% productivity gain when compared with manual screening and a 54% productivity gain when compared with manual screening of PS slides. Use of TIS showed productivity benefits when compared with TPM and both productivity and sensitivity benefits over use of PS.

Autoanalysis↗