PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12513667

Information: needs for the future.

Abstract

The four central questions surrounding the use of information are: where to find it; how to find it; how to present it; and how to maintain information availability and information literacy. It is usually assumed that the main source of information for most scientists is the peer-reviewed journal literature. Traditional journal publishing is beset with a number of problems. Although electronic publishing might possibly solve some of these, it in turn introduces new problems. Further problems arise with respect to secondary sources which, in some cases, are being supplemented by electronic archives of full-text documents. One fundamental question that arises when considering any large collection of documents or of records about documents is whether or not to index them, and how to index them. The pros and cons of free-text searching versus the use of controlled vocabularies are discussed, as is the importance of harmonising the Three Rs-related terminology of existing and proposed thesauri. However, there is a further problem that documents pertinent to the Three Rs are not always indexed from this point of view. Authors need to be made aware that, if the information is not provided in the abstract, there is no easy way to identify and retrieve this document from a database. Small specialised databases on the Three Rs in relation to specific subject areas could provide a further solution, especially if they provide references to conference proceedings and book chapters, which are not usually found in the large bibliographical databases. The provision of training in the use of information resources, and the establishment and maintenance of these resources require investment of money and professional skills. Finally, the future of Three Rs information depends on a recognition that this in an important topic which deserves more than lip service.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Krys Bottrill. 2002. Information: needs for the future.. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290203002s24

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Testing and assessment strategies, including alternative and new approaches.

The object of toxicological testing is to predict possible adverse effect in humans when exposed to chemicals whether used as industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals or pesticides. Animal models are predominantly used in identifying potential hazards of chemicals. The use of laboratory animals raises ethical concern. However, irrespective of animal welfare it is an important aspect of the discipline of toxicology that the primary object is human health. The ideal testing and assessment strategy is simple to use all the available test methods and preferably more in laboratory animal species from which we get as many data as possible in order to obtain the most extensive database for the toxicological evaluation of a chemical. Consequently, the society has decided that certain group of chemicals should be tested accordingly. However, realising that, this idea is not obtainable in practice because there are more than 100000 chemicals which are potential for human exposure, so the development of alternative testing and assessment strategies has taken place in the recent years. The toxicological evaluation should enable the society to cope with the simultaneous requirement of many chemicals for different uses and of the absence of health problems involved with their use. Thus, the regulatory toxicology is a cocktail of science and pragmatism added a crucial concern for animal welfare. Test methods are most often used in a testing sequence as bricks in a testing strategy. The main key driving forces for introducing assessment and testing strategies e.g. using a limited number of tests and/or alternative test methods are: (a) animal welfare considerations; (b) new scientific knowledge i.e. introducing tests for new endpoints and tests for better understanding of mode of action; and (c) lack of testing capacity/reduction of required resources economically as well as time wise.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

The integration of data on physico-chemical properties, in vitro-derived toxicity data and physiologically based kinetic and dynamic as modelling a tool in hazard and risk assessment. A commentary.

Toxicity of a compound for an organism is dependent on the route of exposure, the amount (or concentration), the way in which the compound is taken up, distributes and is eliminated from the organism (ADME, kinetics) and the intrinsic properties (reactivity; mode of action, dynamics) of the compound towards the organism. These three elements: exposure, kinetics and dynamics form the basis of hazard and risk evaluations. Developments in our knowledge of the way in which physico-chemical properties of chemicals (on the one side) and physiological processes in the organism (on the other side) determine a compound's toxicity have greatly increased our understanding of toxicological processes and our ability to interpret experimental results. This has now resulted in the development of model systems in which the above-mentioned processes can be described mathematically. Biokinetic modelling is currently of great interest, but the further development of toxicodynamic modelling is equally important. The combination of both allows the estimation of a compound's critical amount/concentration on the critical site of action, which ideally would be the basis for hazard and risk assessments. In vitro systems have been extremely useful in studying the molecular basis of a chemical's biological activity, including its mechanism(s) of toxic action. Other achievements include the prediction of biological reactivity on the basis of a compound's physico-chemical properties and the construction of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs). However, for the incorporation of in vitro-derived data as well as the results of QSARs, kinetic modelling is indispensable. Thus, biokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling are important (if not crucial) tools in toxicological research and there are increasing opportunities to incorporate the results of this work in hazard and risk assessments. Their implementation will allow a much more scientifically-based and a better structured risk assessment, which will be to a much lesser extent relying on animal experimentation.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗