PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12532369

Ethological methods to develop nursing knowledge.

Fay F Warnock·Marion Allen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Researchers from various fields use ethological methods to systematically observe, describe, and measure animal and human nonverbal behavior. The purpose of this article is to argue that their application in nursing will benefit development of descriptive-level knowledge about complex behavioral phenomena. To advance the argument for applying these methods in nursing, we examine the compatibility of the philosophical assumptions underlying ethology with nursing, assess if ethology can help nursing achieve some of its aims, and determine the benefits of using ethology when observation of a phenomenon is required. Neonatal pain is used to illustrate how ethology can be used to develop descriptive-level nursing knowledge and midrange theory.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Nursing ResearchEthologyHumansInfant, NewbornKnowledgeNeonatal NursingNursing TheoryObservationPain MeasurementJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fay F Warnock, Marion Allen. 2003. Ethological methods to develop nursing knowledge.. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10063

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

An alternative paradigm for clinical nursing research: an exemplar.

Effectiveness research is undertaken to evaluate the effects of interventions in achieving desired outcomes when tested in the real-world conditions of everyday practice. Although the randomized clinical trial (RCT) is considered the gold standard for effectiveness research, its feasibility, generalizability, and the clinical utility of its results are being questioned. This state of the science prompted the call for a paradigm shift, characterized by alternative methods for clinical research. The alternative methods attempt to account for clinical realities when conducting research, with the goal of minimizing discrepancies in the perspective and assumptions underlying practice and research. In this article a theory-driven approach to intervention evaluation is presented as a viable alternative paradigm for clinical research. The application of this approach demands changes in four aspects of research: participant selection criteria, assignment to treatment options, delivery of the intervention, and selection of outcome measures. The changes are discussed at the conceptual level and illustrated with examples from an ongoing multisite study aimed at determining the usefulness of this theory-driven approach to intervention evaluation.

Clinical Nursing Research↗
PubMed2003

Devising and establishing the face and content validity of explicit criteria of consultation competence in UK primary care nurses.

AIM: The aims of this study were (a) to devise a set of prioritised criteria of consultation competence which primary care nurses need to acquire and (b) to determine the face and content validity of these criteria. METHOD: The criteria of consultation competence as contained in the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP) were modified for use with primary care nurses and sent to a stratified sample of UK primary care nurses (n=1126) to determine their face and content validity. RESULTS: Support for the seven categories of consultation competence varied from 93-98% and for the 39 component competences from 88-98%. There was no consensus for alternative or additional categories or components. CONCLUSIONS; We have established the face and content validity of the derived competences. These are suitable for the teaching and assessment of consultation skills of primary care nurses, at all stages of their professional development, when incorporated within an educational package.

Clinical Nursing Research↗