PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12540821

Enhanced dynamic wedge factors at off-axis points in asymmetric fields.

Abstract

Several recent reports have described methods for calculating enhanced dynamic wedge factors (EDWFs). Many of these reports use the monitor-unit (MU) fraction method to predict EDWFs as a function of field size. Although simple in approach, MU fraction methods do not produce accurate EDWFs in large or asymmetric fields. A recently described technique, based on the MU fraction method works well for large and asymmetric fields, but only when the calculation point is in the center of the field. Other existing methods based on beam-segment superposition do not have this limitation. These beam summation methods, however, are difficult to implement in routine clinical MU calculation schemes. In this paper, we present a simple calculation method that estimates EDWFs at off-axis calculation points in both symmetric and asymmetric fields. Our method, which also is based on the MU fraction method, similarly uses empirically determined field-size corrections but also applies wedged-field profiles to estimate EDWFs that are independent of calculation-point location and field symmetry. EDWF measurements for a variety of field sizes and calculation-point locations for both 6- and 18-MV x-ray beams were performed to validate our calculations and those of our ADAC Pinnacle3 Treatment Planning System. The disagreement between the calculated and measured EDWFs over the useful clinical range of field sizes and calculation-point locations was less than 2%. The worst disagreement was 3% and occurred at a point 8.5 cm from the center of an asymmetric 25 (wedged direction)x20 cm2 60 degrees-wedged field. Detailed comparisons of measurements with calculations and wedge factors obtained from the ADAC Pinnacle3 Treatment Planning System will be presented. In addition, the strengths and weaknesses of this calculation method will be discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K L Prado, S M Kirsner, R J Kudchadker, R E Steadham, R G Lane. 2003. Enhanced dynamic wedge factors at off-axis points in asymmetric fields.. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v4i1.2544

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Penalized Cumulative Probability Model for a Continuous Outcome Subject to Detection Limits.

Mixed-type outcome data occur when the outcome variable's distribution is a mixture of both continuous and discrete ordinal variables. Such mixed-type outcomes are common in biomedical, psychological, and the health sciences, particularly for variables having either a detection or quantitation limit. When interest lies in identifying a combination of genomic features associated with a mixed-type outcome, any method used would require a variable selection strategy for high-dimensional data. Unfortunately, few variable selection methods exist for modeling a mixed-type outcome when the covariate space is high dimensional. This study develops a high-dimensional penalized cumulative probability model (CPM), to allow for the identification of genomic features associated with mixed-type outcome of interest. We demonstrated how such model may be estimated using the iterative penalization procedure-the generalized monotone incremental forward stagewise (GMIFS) algorithm. The Model-X knockoffs procedure was combined with the estimation algorithm to control the false discovery rates (FDR) when performing variable selection. Through extensive simulation studies, our penalized CPM was shown to outperform alternative methods in terms of controlled variable selection performance by achieving high statistical power with the FDR being controlled at the target level. We demonstrate the utility of our method by applying it to predict estimated glomeruli filtration rate (eGFR) in kidney transplant recipients at 24 months post-transplant using baseline gene expression data as predictors. Our CPM model identified five genes associated with this mixed-type outcome which have important links to renal disease, which may provide prognostic guidance for kidney transplantation recipients.

Models, Statistical↗

SNPchip: R classes and methods for SNP array data.

UNLABELLED: High-density single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays (SNP chips) provide information on a subject's genome, such as copy number and genotype (heterozygosity/homozygosity) at a SNP. While fluorescence in situ hybridization and karyotyping reveal many abnormalities, SNP chips provide a higher resolution map of the human genome that can be used to detect, e.g., aneuploidies, microdeletions, microduplications and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). As a variety of diseases are linked to such chromosomal abnormalities, SNP chips promise new insights for these diseases by aiding in the discovery of such regions, and may suggest targets for intervention. The R package SNPchip contains classes and methods useful for storing, visualizing and analyzing high density SNP data. Originally developed from the SNPscan web-tool, SNPchip utilizes S4 classes and extends other open source R tools available at Bioconductor. This has numerous advantages, including the ability to build statistical models for SNP-level data that operate on instances of the class, and to communicate with other R packages that add additional functionality. AVAILABILITY: The package is available from the Bioconductor web page at www.bioconductor.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplementary material as described in this article (case studies, installation guidelines and R code) is available from http://biostat.jhsph.edu/~iruczins/publications/sm/

Models, Statistical↗

Using SAS to conduct nonparametric residual bootstrap multilevel modeling with a small number of groups.

In multilevel modeling, researchers often encounter data with a relatively small number of units at the higher levels. As a result, of this and/or non-normality of the residuals, model parameter estimates, particularly the variance components and standard errors of parameter estimates at the group level, may be biased, thus the corresponding statistical inferences may not be trustworthy. This problem can be addressed by using bootstrap methods to estimate the standard errors of the parameter estimates for significance testing. This study illustrates how to use statistical analysis system (SAS) to conduct nonparametric residual bootstrap multilevel modeling. Specific SAS programs for such modeling are provided.

Models, Statistical↗