PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12557723

[Bioethics in studies on genetic polymorphisms].

Abstract

In studies on human genetic polymorphisms, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), little immediate benefit is expected for the individuals contributing the test samples. Such lack of immediate benefits should be noted in the informed consent form obtained prior to sample collection. Ethical considerations are indispensable in obtaining human samples for any type of human gene analysis, and researchers should respect the human rights of the contributors of the samples. Considerable differences in the guidelines for human gene analysis are seen between internationally distributed guidelines and the guidelines of the Japanese government. Lack of education in human genetics in medical schools in Japan could be a reason underlining this difference, and improvement of such situation is needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hiraku Takebe. 2003. [Bioethics in studies on genetic polymorphisms].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12557723/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.

Two protechnology arguments, the "hopeful principle" and the "automatic escalator", often used in bioethics, are identified and critically analysed in this paper. It is shown that the hopeful principle is closely related to the problematic precautionary principle, and the automatic escalator argument has close affinities to the often criticised empirical slippery slope argument. The hopeful principle is shown to be really hopeless as an argument, and automatic escalator arguments often lead nowhere when critically analysed. These arguments should therefore only be used with great caution.

Bioethics↗