PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1256212

The cochlear implant; basic principles.

Abstract

In recent years the cochlear implant has been a subject of much discussion and controversy. The clinician has often been confused by the conflicting reports of success and failure. In this paper the development of the cochlear implant is reviewed and its present status summarized. It is hoped that the clinician may thereby gain an understanding of this device so that he can better evaluate its present and future status. Selection of Patients for Cochlear Implantation. The cochlear implant will benefit only those patients with hair cell loss who have remaining viable auditory neurons. In order to determine whether viable neurons remain, an electric current is passed through a small needle which is place into the promontory through the tympanic membrane. If patients experience an auditory sensation as a result of this electrical stimulation, it is felt that they are suitable candidates for a cochlear implant. Feasibility of Long-Term VIIIth Nerve Stimulation. Many questions have been raised regarding the feasibility of long-term stimulation of the auditory nerve. The first question raised was whether the auditory nerve would survive severe hair cell degeneration. Studies have shown that in most cases at least a few auditory neurons remain. The next question was whether the cochlear implant itself would destroy the remaining auditory neurons. Preliminary studies have shown that the nerve will survive the placement of electrodes both into the modiolus and the scala tympani. Several electrode materials and insulation have been found to be well tolerated, and there has been minimal damage from thermal or electrolytic processes; therefore, it appears feasible to stimulate the auditory nerve over a long period. Information Transfer by Electrical Stimulation. Single-channel stimulation produces only periodicity pitch, and information transfer is insufficient for speech discrimination. Experience to date indicates that it will be possible to produce both place and volley pitch by electrical stimulation with multiple electrodes in the scala tympani. These findings give promise for the feasibility of producing a device which will transfer sufficient information to produce speech discrimination. Present Status of the Cochlear Implant. To the present time 15 patients have been implanted with a unipolar electrode under the direction of the Ear Research Institute. These patients have all benefited from their devices. They are able to perceive background sounds and receive a cadence or rhythm to speech which makes the device helpful in lipreading. None of the patients have developed significant speech discrimination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Brackmann. 1976. The cochlear implant; basic principles.. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197603000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[The phenomenon of hearing: an interdisciplinary discussion. II].

This part of the paper deals with the neurophysiological background of speech analysis and hearing of music. Single vowel- and consonant-detector cells could be clearly separated at the colliculus and geniculate level (Kallert, Keidel). Musical stimulation is decoded at three levels: hair cells, geniculate, and auditory cortex. Human cortical evoked potentials represent rhythm, consonance, and (as DC-shift) the emotional content of music. Marked harmonics, even of single hair-cell vibrations and in single units of medial geniculate in combination with clock-cell networks, are the physiological basis of "harmony" in music. Dissonant stimuli are detectable at the cortical level in man (Finkenzeller, Keidel).

Auditory Cortex

Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system.

A 14-channel SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) system has been used to record the magnetic signal from the human brain in response to an auditory stimuli (750, 1,000, 1,250 and 1,500 Hz, 70, 76 and 82 dB SPL, 500 ms duration). Three individuals with normal hearing were studied. The locations of magnetic response at the latency of 70 ms (P70), 100 ms (N100) and 160 ms (P160) from the onset of the auditory stimulus were identified. The location for N100 response corresponded to the primary auditory cortex (area 41), where a clear tonotopic organization was demonstrated. The amplitopic organization was less evident. These results suggest a flow of auditory signals in the temporal lobe and tonotopic organization in the auditory cortex.

Auditory Cortex

Neuromagnetic auditory evoked responses after a stroke in the right temporal lobe.

Auditory evoked magnetic fields were recorded with a 24-SQUID magnetometer on a patient with a vascular lesion in the right auditory cortex and its vicinity. The contralateral transient 100 ms response (N100m) was absent over the damaged side, with no recovery within 16 months. Responses were normal over the healthy side. The responses to a binaural click train where interaural delays caused the perception of a shifting sound source; responses were again normal over the left side. Ipsilateral tones elicited N100m over the normal hemisphere but with smaller amplitude and longer latency than in healthy subjects. We suggest that ipsilateral responses are triggered by ipsilateral afferents but are significantly modified by excitatory callosal connections which did not work in our patient.

Auditory Cortex