Application of single-drop microextraction and comparison with solid-phase microextraction and solid-phase extraction for the determination of alpha- and beta-endosulfan in water samples by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection.

M C López-Blanco; S Blanco-Cid; B Cancho-Grande; J Simal-Gándara

doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01873-3

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12564696

Application of single-drop microextraction and comparison with solid-phase microextraction and solid-phase extraction for the determination of alpha- and beta-endosulfan in water samples by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection.

M C López-Blanco·S Blanco-Cid·B Cancho-Grande·J Simal-Gándara

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Water contamination due to the wide variety of pesticides used in agriculture practices is a global environmental pollution problem. The 98/83 European Directive requires the measurement of pesticides residues at a target concentration of 1.0 microg/l in surface water and 0.1 microg/l in drinking water. In order to reach the level of detection required, efficient extraction techniques are necessary. The application of a new extraction technique: single-drop microextraction (SDME), followed by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection, was assessed for determining alpha-endosulfan and beta-endosulfan in water samples. Experimental parameters which control the performance of SDME, such as selection of microextraction solvent and internal standard, optimization of organic drop volume, effects of sample stirring, temperature and salt addition, and sorption time profiles were studied. Once SDME was optimized, analytical parameters such as linearity, precision, detection and quantitation limits, plus matrix effects were evaluated. The SDME method was compared with solid-phase microextraction and solid-phase extraction with the aim of selecting the most appropriate method for a certain application.

Explore related subjects

Chromatography, Gas Endosulfan Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated Insecticides Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Sodium Chloride Temperature Water Pollutants, Chemical Comparative Study Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M C López-Blanco, S Blanco-Cid, B Cancho-Grande, J Simal-Gándara. 2003-01-17. Application of single-drop microextraction and comparison with solid-phase microextraction and solid-phase extraction for the determination of alpha- and beta-endosulfan in water samples by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01873-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

Prediction of the resolution of capillary columns in different conditions of inlet pressure and temperature.

A procedure previously described for the prediction of the plate height of capillary columns operated at different inlet pressure of the carrier gas and at various column temperatures by using few retention data measured under isobaric conditions was modified and improved in order to permit the prediction of the retention times and of the peak widths at various heights. It is therefore possible to calculate the ratio, delta, between the peak width at different heights and the peak width at half height, whose value is used to predict the resolution at different height of two closely eluting peaks. It was found that the delta values do not depend on temperature and inlet pressure and are a characteristic of the used column; they can therefore be used in order to calculate the resolution in any temperature and inlet pressure condition. The method was used to predict the retention time, the peak width and the resolution of polar and non-polar compounds (alkanes, alkenes, chloroalkanes, alcohols, ketones) on capillary columns of different length and polarity by using as the starting data retention and width values measured in three isobaric runs only.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed2004

Potential of SPME-GC and chemometrics to detect adulteration of soft fruit purées.

The potential of combining solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with gas chromatography and chemometric data analysis to differentiate between pure strawberry samples (Fragraria ananassa) and strawberry samples adulterated with 10, 40, and 70% (v/v) apple purée was investigated. The method involved the extraction of aroma volatiles from the headspace of the purée samples using a SPME fiber followed by GC analysis with flame ionization detection. The principal component analysis (PCA) data matrix consisted of the relative percent peak areas of 37 compounds deemed to be significant in the differentiation of the samples on the basis of adulteration. The PCA results clearly showed that differentiation of the adulterated and unadulterated samples was possible, particularly at the higher levels of adulteration. Partial least-squares regression (PLSR) using a dummy set of Y variables (set to 0 for unadulterated and 1 for adulterated samples) resulted in clear discrimination between unadulterated purées and those containing 40 and 70% (v/v) apple. PLSR using a second set of Y variables, consisting of the actual level of adulteration, enabled quantification of apple purée with a standard error of prediction of 11.6%, implying a minimum detectable level of 25% (v/v) apple. GC-MS analysis enabled identification of the compounds with the greatest influence on sample differentiation. These compounds were identified as hexanoic acid, 2-hexenal, and alpha-farnesene, all of which are key aroma compounds in apples.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed2004

Optimisation of stir bar sorptive extraction for the analysis of volatile phenols in wines.

An easy, fast and reliable analytical method is proposed for the determination of the concentration of volatile phenols (ethyl- and vinylphenols) in wines. The novel stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) technique is employed, following a simple and fast procedure that allows 15 samples to be extracted simultaneously using very small sample volume. Extracts are desorbed in a thermodesorption system (TDS) coupled on-line to a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry system. The SBSE offers better recovery and linear regression coefficient (r2) for the four volatile phenols than solid-phase extraction (SPE). The mass spectrometric detection in selected ion monitoring mode contributes to the lower detection limit and good sensibility obtained with this method.

Chromatography, Gas↗