PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12564880

Virtual tagging: numerical considerations and phantom validation.

Sharmeen Masood·Jianxin Gao·Guang-Zhong Yang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents a virtual tagging framework for measuring, as well as visualising, myocardial deformation using magnetic resonance (MR) velocity imaging. Tagging grids are allocated artificially according to the deformation gradient with varying shapes and densities. The control points are then deformed such that the difference between the induced deformation velocity and that of actually measured MR data is minimum. A full three-dimensional implementation of the technique combined with the mass conservation constraint is provided. Numerical considerations of applying the proposed framework and different optimization strategies have been investigated with both simulated and phantom experiments. The accuracy of the technique in terms of following material deformation is compared with that of conventional tagging technique.

Explore related subjects

Finite Element AnalysisHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardial ContractionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sharmeen Masood, Jianxin Gao, Guang-Zhong Yang. 2002. Virtual tagging: numerical considerations and phantom validation.. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2002.804429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Double-Axis Maxillary Skeletal Expander Suggests Higher Expansion Efficiency in Early Activation: A Finite Element Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional single-axis maxillary skeletal expanders (MSE) have some drawbacks, such as limited control over maxillary expansion and possible asymmetric expansion between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS). This report introduces a double-axis maxillary skeletal expander (DAMSE) concept to overcome these drawbacks and enhance the efficiency of maxillary skeletal expansion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different DAMSE designs were compared with a conventional single-axis MSE. Finite element analysis was performed to analyse their expansion efficiency, stress magnitude and distribution occurring in a simplified bone model. RESULTS: DAMSE outperformed the single-axis MSE and provided better control over ANS and PNS expansion. During early activation, the highest expansion efficiency (31.7%) was achieved by DAMSE Model V, 13% more efficient than the single-axis MSE. This efficiency was increased to 100.8% by combining the DAMSE Model V with midpalatal suture surgery. However, with the simplified bone model, the current study could not demonstrate that DAMSE can resolve the issue of asymmetric expansion between ANS and PNS. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriately designed DAMSE can be a promising tool for maxillary expansion treatment. DAMSE offers more efficient treatment than the conventional single-axis MSE while maintaining similar levels of patient comfort and invasiveness.

Finite Element Analysis↗
PubMed2003

Orthopaedic crossfire--Larger femoral heads: a triumph of hope over reason! In the affirmative.

The authors' wear studies of total hip arthroplasty cohorts have shown that less polyethylene wear and less deleterious effects of third body debris were found when smaller femoral head sizes were used. The authors' sliding-distance-coupled finite element model findings were corroborated by these clinical wear studies. Thus, with polyethylene on metal bearing surfaces, less wear should occur when smaller head sizes are used. Careful, precise component positioning is important to prevent dislocation.

Finite Element Analysis↗
PubMed2003

Gait cycle finite element comparison of rotating-platform total knee designs.

Functional load transmission and kinematic performance were compared for standard versus posterior-stabilized versions of a rotating-platform total knee implant, over a standardized loading cycle, using three-dimensional contact finite element analysis. These two design variants differ primarily in terms of the latter's polyethylene insert having a cam that engages with the femoral component during appreciable flexion, thereby inducing femoral component rollback. The finite element model, previously validated experimentally, afforded direct comparisons of anterior lift-off of the insert from the tibial tray, of bearing mobility (insert rotation about the pivot post), of femoral rollback, and of metal-on-polyethylene contact stresses at the bearing and backside surfaces of the insert. Both design variants generally performed comparably, exhibiting an internal and external rotation range of approximately 5 degrees, approximately 1.5 mm peak lift-off at the anterior aspect of the insert, and approximately 15 mm of posterior rollback, the respective maxima for both designs occurring at approximately the same instants in the gait cycle. However, the posterior-stabilized design had slightly more rollback, and slightly less anterior lift-off and rotation, than did the standard rotating-platform design. Peak polyethylene stresses occurred on the backside of the insert near the posterior edge of the medial compartment, the magnitude being approximately 18% higher for the posterior-stabilized design (21 MPa) than for the standard design.

Finite Element Analysis↗