PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12603046

Mining terminological knowledge in large biomedical corpora.

Abstract

Terminological knowledge of the biomedical domain is important for natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval (IR) applications, and a number of terminological knowledge sources, such as LocusLink, GeneBank, and the UMLS, already exist. However, because of the tremendous amount of research activity in the field, new terms and symbols are continually being created, many of which are published in the literature, but are not available in any of the other resources. Therefore, effective mining of the literature for new terminology is critical for furthering NLP and IR applications. Abbreviations are widely used in the biomedical domain, and the understanding of abbreviations requires a terminological knowledge base that consists of abbreviations with their associated senses. In previous work, several methods have been developed for automatic construction of abbreviation knowledge bases from parenthetical expressions. However, these methods pair abbreviations and their expansions based on manually crafted patterns or rules. In this paper, we propose an automatic method, which is not based on patterns or rules but is based on the use of collocations, to extract a set of related terms from parenthetical expressions including abbreviations associated with their expansions and other types of related terms such as synonyms, or hyponyms etc. Our method is based on the observation that terms associated with parenthetical expressions i) are usually related, and ii) are often collocations because they tend to co-occur more often than expected by chance. Our method was applied to the collection of MEDLINE abstracts. The method and the results were evaluated using two collections: Berman's handcrafted abbreviation list and the LocusLink collection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hongfang Liu, Carol Friedman. 2003. Mining terminological knowledge in large biomedical corpora.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12603046/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparative evaluation of full-text, concept-based, and context-sensitive search.

OBJECTIVES: Study comparatively (1) concept-based search, using documents pre-indexed by a conceptual hierarchy; (2) context-sensitive search, using structured, labeled documents; and (3) traditional full-text search. Hypotheses were: (1) more contexts lead to better retrieval accuracy; and (2) adding concept-based search to the other searches would improve upon their baseline performances. DESIGN: Use our Vaidurya architecture, for search and retrieval evaluation, of structured documents classified by a conceptual hierarchy, on a clinical guidelines test collection. MEASUREMENTS: Precision computed at different levels of recall to assess the contribution of the retrieval methods. Comparisons of precisions done with recall set at 0.5, using t-tests. RESULTS: Performance increased monotonically with the number of query context elements. Adding context-sensitive elements, mean improvement was 11.1% at recall 0.5. With three contexts, mean query precision was 42% +/- 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31% to 53%); with two contexts, 32% +/- 13% (95% CI, 27% to 38%); and one context, 20% +/- 9% (95% CI, 15% to 24%). Adding context-based queries to full-text queries monotonically improved precision beyond the 0.4 level of recall. Mean improvement was 4.5% at recall 0.5. Adding concept-based search to full-text search improved precision to 19.4% at recall 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated usefulness of concept-based and context-sensitive queries for enhancing the precision of retrieval from a digital library of semi-structured clinical guideline documents. Concept-based searches outperformed free-text queries, especially when baseline precision was low. In general, the more ontological elements used in the query, the greater the resulting precision.

Abstracting and Indexing↗

Improvements to the Red List Index.

The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.

Abstracting and Indexing↗