External fixation indications and patient selection.

Abstract

Since its modest beginnings in the mid-nineteenth century, external fixation has seen great changes in its design and application. Once thought of as chiefly a fracture management tool, this modality has found its way into the arenas of corrective osteotomies, Charcot management, limb lengthening, nonunion treatment, and malalignment correction. As external fixation has evolved, great improvements in associated complications have also occurred. This is attributed to evolving frame design, subsequent increased stability, and advances in pin/wire insertion techniques. Paley and Herzenberg describe three factors to consider when evaluating whether to use external or internal fixation [2]. 1. Risk versus benefit of the method used for that specific indication. 2. Surgeon's experience with the specific method. 3. Ability to treat the potential complications of the surgery. The authors agree with these factors but would also include psychological tolerance, compliance with postoperative self-treatment, and personal hygiene. In this article the indications for external fixation were described in terms of pathology and individual patient factors were discussed for the surgeon's consideration. The surgeon must consider the patient's bone quality, age, cognitive ability, psychological tolerance, and compliance level. With these factors kept in mind and evaluated appropriately, the surgeon should be able to select the patient and indications for which external fixation will yield a superior result.