PubMed · 12623540
Learned irrelevance and retrospective correlation learning.
Abstract
In 1973 Mackintosh reported an interference effect that he called learned irrelevance in which exposure to uncorrelated (CS/US) presentation of the unconditional stimulus (US) and the conditioned stimulus (CS) interfered with future Pavlovian conditioning. It has been argued that there is no specific interference effect in learned irrelevance; rather the interference is the sum of independent CS and US exposure effects (CS + US). We review previous research on this question and report two new experiments. We conclude that learned irrelevance is a consequence of a contingency learning and a specific learned irrelevance mechanism. Moreover even the independent exposure controls, used in previous experiments to support the CS and US exposure account, provide support for the correlation learning process.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A G Baker, Robin A Murphy, Rick Mehta. 2003. Learned irrelevance and retrospective correlation learning.. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000197
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.