PubMed · 12624857
Differentiating quality improvement from research.
Abstract
Monitoring of quality of care has always been an important part of health care. Self-regulation and external standards require care providers to furnish safe environments for the patient. Similarities in methods used by quality improvement (QI) projects and clinical research have created some confusion in differentiating the two practices. This article reviews the current literature and differences between QI and research. In addition, the article identifies and discusses four criteria: intervention, risk, audience, and data source, which allow investigators to differentiate between the two practices and follow the appropriate procedures for project review.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Anita C Reinhardt, Leslie N Ray. 2003. Differentiating quality improvement from research.. https://doi.org/10.1053/apnr.2003.50000
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.