PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1269148

Comparative study of two methods for hepatitis B antigen (HBAg) detection: double sequential counterimmunoelectrophoresis (DCIEP) and Ausria II-125I radioimmunoassay.

J Szántay·D Dejica·O Abrudan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Double sequential counterimmunoelectrophoresis (DCIEP) (an improved method that we have developed) and Ausria II-125I (an indirect solid-phase radioimmunoassay) were compared for HBAg detection in chronic liver diseases. 26.8% of the patients were positive using DCIEP and 41.8% were positive with Ausria II125I. The conventional counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) is less sensitive than DCIEP, the level of positive results being 18.8% (P less than 0.001)9

Explore related subjects

Chronic DiseaseCounterimmunoelectrophoresisEvaluation Studies as TopicHepatitis B AntigensHumansLiver DiseasesRadioimmunoassayComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Szántay, D Dejica, O Abrudan. 1976-05-17. Comparative study of two methods for hepatitis B antigen (HBAg) detection: double sequential counterimmunoelectrophoresis (DCIEP) and Ausria II-125I radioimmunoassay.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(76)90480-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2007

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗