PubMed · 12705215
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Thom Dick. 2003. Maximum fun level. Working with a slug.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12705215/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The medical emergency team (MET), which may be summoned by anyone in a hospital to treat a patient who appears acutely unwell, has been generally accepted as scientifically rational, with no adverse clinical outcomes and only modest resource requirements. Despite this, many centres appear to be awaiting "gold standard" evidence of its effectiveness. We suggest that the quest for evidence is providing scientific justification for institutional inertia, and that further delay in implementing this system may even be unethical. We propose that decisions about changes in healthcare should consider scientific rationality, clinical reasonableness and resource implications, as well as evidence and ethical implications.
A GP practice set up a new system of assessing patients, with an emphasis on appropriate immediate need. The aim is to speed up treatment and reduce inappropriate accident and emergency admissions. A new role of community paramedic on loan from the ambulance trust was a vital part of the team. The first eight months dramatically cut accident and emergency admissions and sped up category A response times.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.