PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12715282

Two craniotomy arguments don't make it.

Robert P Goodwin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Craniotomy as a surgical procedure used in the delivery of a fetus is subject to various moral judgments, some positive and some negative. This article gives consideration to two arguments offered for the moral legitimacy of the craniotomy. Each argument is closely examined and each is found to be flawed and hence inconclusive.

Explore related subjects

CraniotomyDelivery, ObstetricEthicsEthics, ClinicalFemaleFetusHumansMoralsPregnancyUnited StatesGenetics and ReproductionPhilosophical ApproachJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert P Goodwin. 2003. Two craniotomy arguments don't make it.. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.28.1.79.14174

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Scalp reconstruction.

Scalp reconstruction after oncologic resection can be challenging. Wide surgical resections, in combination with co-morbid conditions such as infected alloplastic material, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, or devascularized bone after craniotomy necessitate healthy, vascularized tissues for reconstruction. Although primary closure is feasible in some cases, the mainstay of treatment involves local tissue rearrangement with or without split thickness skin grafting. In addition, free tissue transfer is an important adjunct to therapy in patients with poor local tissues. Careful analysis of the defect and local tissues can help tailor the method of reconstruction and result in satisfactory closure in a majority of patients. Current techniques used for scalp reconstruction after surgical ablation are the subject of this review.

Craniotomy↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of craniotomy and craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma.

Despite the increasing acceptance of craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury, the value of early decompressive craniectomy in patients with acute subdural haematoma is still under debate. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 180 patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma, 111 of whom were treated with haematoma evacuation via craniotomy and 69 of whom were treated with early decompressive craniectomy. Due to the higher incidence of signs of herniation for patients in the craniectomy group, the mortality rate in this group was higher than that in the craniotomy group (53% vs. 32.3%). However, overall there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. Age and clinical signs of herniation were significantly associated with an unfavourable outcome, regardless of the type of surgery. Decompressive craniectomy did not seem to have a therapeutic advantage over craniotomy in traumatic acute subdural haematoma.

Craniotomy↗