PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1275563

Reducing sample sizes when comparing experimental and control groups.

Abstract

In comparing rates for two groups (one control and the other experimental), one may use an historical control to reduce the sample size needed for a test of significance to one-fourth that required if the control is not historical. If there is some doubt as to whether one's control is comparable to the historical control, a test showing the equality of the historical and experimental controls can lead to a halving of the sample required for significance testing. This same argument also applies to the comparison of two means.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Browne. Reducing sample sizes when comparing experimental and control groups.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1976.10667213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of two assumptions: single straight line, and single normal distribution.

Using graphical and statistical approaches, Laszlo Endrenyi and Mayank Patel describe methods that answer two frequently asked questions: 'Can the data be characterized by a single straight line, or should a more complex model be invoked?' and 'Do the observations follow a single normal distribution, or is there evidence for deviations from this assumption, including the possibility of bimodality?" These methods complement those addressed in a recent Principles article by Dick Barlow.

Research Design