PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12766512

Resynchronization therapy: implications for pacemaker implantation in Europe.

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization has proved a valuable adjunctive therapy in heart failure patients with ventricular conduction disturbances. It improves the patient's clinical status and quality of life, increases functional capacity and causes left ventricular reverse remodeling. The application of this new therapeutic method is expected to affect the pacemaker implantation rate, although the exact degree cannot yet be calculated. One of the main determining factors is the number of patients who are candidates for resynchronization therapy. Although this cannot be estimated precisely, it seems that it does not exceed 10-14% of heart failure patients. Additional factors that will influence the implantation rate, at least during the next few years, are the familiarization of cardiologists with the new implantation technique and follow-up, the availability of cardiac laboratory time and the cost of this new therapy. Although the latter seems high, the financial burden will be minimal when it is taken into consideration that it will lead to a decrease in the number of hospital admissions and a significant reduction in the number of hospitalization days, the greatest determining factors in the current high management cost of heart failure patients. Further to the above, taking the differences between the implantation rates of conventional pacing systems into account in different European countries, the same could be expected of biventricular systems. Thus, although the incidence of heart failure is constantly increasing and conduction disturbances are frequent in such patients, we believe that the implantation rate of biventricular systems in Europe will not exceed an average of 10 per million population, fluctuating according to the country. In conclusion, resynchronization therapy has been established in special subsets of heart failure patients. Due to the epidemiological characteristics of heart failure, the implantation rate is expected to rise. Possible education and/or training issues that appear will be addressed respectively, enabling all suitable patients to enjoy the benefits this new therapeutic technique ensures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Panos E Vardas, Emmanuel N Simantirakis. 2003. Resynchronization therapy: implications for pacemaker implantation in Europe.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1023626603839

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medium-term follow-up and modes of failure following epicardial pacemaker implantation in young children.

AIMS: Young children suffering from congenital or post-operative AV-block require life-long pacemaker stimulation. Due to the anatomical prerequisites initially epicardial electrodes are implanted and the generator is placed in the upper abdominal wall. The following study investigated modes of failure leading to reoperation in this group of technically challenging patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October 2000 and May 2005, a total of 21 infants (age 3 days to 5 years) underwent pacemaker implantation using a subxyphoidal incision for newborns (and a partial lower or complete median sternotomy for older children). Nine patients had previous cardiac surgery for complex congenital defects. The remaining 12 young children suffered from congenital AV-Block (CAVB). Twenty-one bipolar epicardial electrodes (Medtronic Capsure epi) were fixed to the right ventricle, 15 had additional implantation of a bipolar atrial lead. The pacemaker generator (Medtronic Kappa 701) was implanted into the right upper abdominal wall. Indications for revision were recorded. No mortality was observed; pacing and sensing parameters remained stable up to a 5-year follow-up. A total of four reoperations occurred. Three of the four revisions were caused by ventricular electrode fracture. At revision, two electrodes were broken at the crossing between the pericardial cavity and the abdominal wall, one bipolar lead at the Y-division into the two tip electrodes. One reoperation was due to a pacemaker recall. All revisions were performed without complications. CONCLUSION: In our institute epicardial pacing in young children was associated with a satisfactory clinical outcome, but also a significant number of failures leading to reoperation, mainly due to electrode fracture caused by the muscular activity of this patient group. Reoperations were performed at a low risk.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗

Spectral pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging lateral-to-septal delay fails to predict clinical or echocardiographic outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: The current study sought to assess if pre-implantation lateral-to-septal delay (LSD) > or =60 ms assessed by spectral pulsed-wave myocardial tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI) could predict successful long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients (72% males, mean age 59 +/- 10 years) who were referred for CRT according to the ACC/ESC guidelines were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent spectral PW-TDI before and 1 year after CRT. Two left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony time intervals, T(O) and T(P) (time to onset and peak of LV myocardial velocity, respectively), LSD were recorded. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as LSD > or =60 ms. Clinical response was defined as an improvement in >1 NYHA class plus improvement in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) > or =25%, echocardiographic response was defined as a > or =15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LV-ESV). One year after CRT, 50 patients (83%) were clinical responders and 47 patients (78%) were echocardiographic responders. Both T(O) and T(P) LV dyssynchrony indices failed to predict echocardiographic CRT outcome. In addition, there were no significant differences between 'synchronous' and 'dyssynchronous' patient populations at baseline or follow-up in either clinical (NYHA class and 6MWD) or echocardiographic (LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic, and end-systolic) variables. CONCLUSION: The great majority of patients referred for CRT benefit clinically from it. However, spectral PW-TDI failed to predict CRT outcome. When PW-TDI dyssynchrony was applied for selection of proper CRT patients, up to 80-86% of the patients with synchronous LSD that had proven clinical and echocardiographic benefit from CRT would have been denied CRT.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗