PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12772368

When things go wrong.

Abstract

Case histories are based on actual medical negligence claims, however, certain facts have been omitted or changed by the author to ensure the anonymity of the parties involved. Despite the best intentions of medical practitioners, things do go wrong from time to time and a patient may experience an adverse outcome as a result of a medical practitioner's actions. This article discusses some of the issues that general practitioners should consider when things go wrong.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sara Bird. 2003. When things go wrong.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12772368/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Initial misdiagnosis and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

CONTEXT: Mortality and morbidity can be reduced if aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is treated urgently. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of initial misdiagnosis and outcome after SAH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Inception cohort of 482 SAH patients admitted to a tertiary care urban hospital between August 1996 and August 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Misdiagnosis was defined as failure to correctly diagnose SAH at a patient's initial contact with a medical professional. Functional outcome was assessed at 3 and 12 months with the modified Rankin Scale; quality of life (QOL), with the Sickness Impact Profile. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (12%) were initially misdiagnosed, including 42 of 221 (19%) of those with normal mental status at first contact. Migraine or tension headache (36%) was the most common incorrect diagnosis, and failure to obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan was the most common diagnostic error (73%). Neurologic complications occurred in 22 patients (39%) before they were correctly diagnosed, including 12 patients (21%) who experienced rebleeding. Normal mental status, small SAH volume, and right-sided aneurysm location were independently associated with misdiagnosis. Among patients with normal mental status at first contact, misdiagnosis was associated with worse QOL at 3 months and an increased risk of death or severe disability at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, misdiagnosis of SAH occurred in 12% of patients and was associated with a smaller hemorrhage and normal mental status. Among individuals who initially present in good condition, misdiagnosis is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. A low threshold for CT scanning of patients with mild symptoms that are suggestive of SAH may reduce the frequency of misdiagnosis.

Diagnostic Errors↗

Ectopic ureters misdiagnosed as ureterocele.

Ectopic ureters may be difficult to diagnose unless there is high index of suspicion. Examination for continuous dribbling may be difficult in infants who are still using diapers. We are reporting a case of ectopic ureter which was erroneously diagnosed as ureterocele on a cystourethrogram. Further investigations for accurate diagnosis and emerging abnormalities during the course of management are presented in this case report. Review of literature to highlight the various forms of investigations and management are also presented.

Diagnostic Errors↗

The cocoon sign: a potential sonographic pitfall in the diagnosis of twin - twin transfusion syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency and clinical importance of the cocoon sign in twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: Charts and ultrasound images of all pregnancies with TTTS that underwent selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels at our institution over a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed for a cocoon sign. TTTS had been diagnosed and prospectively staged if monochorionicity was suspected and the maximum vertical pocket (MVP) of amniotic fluid in one gestational sac was >/=8 cm, while the MVP in the other gestational sac was </=2 cm. The cocoon sign was diagnosed when there was an ultrasound finding of a donor twin with severe oligohydramnios enveloped by dividing membranes and connected to the uterine wall by a laminar stalk of these membranes. RESULTS: The cocoon sign was noted in 9/58 (15.5%) cases. There were no differences in gestational age and stage of TTTS upon presentation, gestational age at delivery or number of neonatal survivors between the groups of TTTS cases with and those without a cocoon sign. One patient in the cocoon group had been misdiagnosed because the donor twin's MVP was measured from the donor's tethered membranes to the posterior wall of the uterus within the recipient's sac. CONCLUSIONS: The cocoon sign is present in at least 15% of patients with TTTS. Its recognition is important to avoid misdiagnosis of TTTS. The practical implications and potential complications of this sonographic sign are discussed.

Diagnostic Errors↗