PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12780978

Adrenal function in pediatric critical illness.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adrenal dysfunction has been documented in critically ill adult populations and in children with septic shock and may have serious consequences if undiagnosed. However, there is no information available on adrenal function in critically ill children with various underlying conditions. DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study was carried out to investigate the occurrence of adrenal dysfunction in pediatric critical illness. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients were consecutively recruited from a pediatric critical care unit with Pediatric Risk of Mortality Scores (PRISM; illness severity scores) >/=10 and hemodynamic instability as defined by the need for inotropes and/or >20 mL/kg fluid in a 24-hr period. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels were measured followed by post-ACTH stimulation test cortisol levels to determine adrenal reserve. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline cortisol levels ranged from 0.10 to 37.4 &mgr;g/dL (mean, 12.2 +/- 9.6). Adrenal dysfunction as defined by a baseline cortisol level of <7 &mgr;g/dL (am cortisol) or a post-ACTH stimulation level of <18 &mgr;g/dL was observed in four of the 13 patients (31%; 95% confidence interval, 5.7%,55.9%). All three of the patients with baseline cortisol levels of <7 &mgr;g/dL had low-normal ACTH levels. There was no difference in baseline PRISM scores (14.7 +/- 4.11, 12.7 +/- 2.65; p =.37) or admitting diagnoses for those with and without adrenal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that some critically ill children do no mount adequate basal cortisol levels in the face of severe physiologic stress but do respond to external ACTH stimulation to better delineate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critically ill children and to determine the clinical consequences of these biochemical abnormalities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kusum Menon, Cheril Clarson. 2002. Adrenal function in pediatric critical illness.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00130478-200204000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗