PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12803192

HIV testing--United States, 2001.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As of December 2001, a cumulative total of 816,149 cases of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) had been reported to CDC (1). One of CDC's national human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)--prevention goals for 2005 (Goal 2) is to increase the proportion of HIV-infected persons in the United States who know they are infected from an estimated 70% to 95% (2). A goal of the new CDC initiative, Advancing HIV Prevention: New Strategies for a Changing Epidemic, is to ensure that every HIV-infected person has the opportunity to be tested and has access to state-of-the-art medical care and prevention services needed to prevent HIV transmission (3). To characterize the prevalence of HIV-antibody testing among U.S. adults, CDC analyzed data from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The findings document variability in HIV testing prevalence by area and by sex within areas, underscoring the ongoing need to promote voluntary HIV counseling and testing that will provide persons with early knowledge of their HIV status and offer them access to appropriate counseling and treatment.

Explore related subjects

AIDS SerodiagnosisAdultAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHIV InfectionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2003-06-13. HIV testing--United States, 2001.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12803192/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Can increasing awareness of HIV seropositivity reduce infections by 50% in the United States?

BACKGROUND: In 2003, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced an HIV prevention initiative that emphasized increasing the proportion of persons living with HIV who are aware of their positive serostatus. Previously, CDC set a national HIV prevention goal of reducing new infections by 50% by 2005, with increasing serostatus awareness a central goal. The objectives of this article are to examine the national epidemiologic consequences of increasing serostatus awareness and the important question of how far increasing awareness could lead toward achieving CDC's goal of a 50% reduction in incident infections. METHODS: Scenario analysis methods were used to project incident HIV infections over 1- and 10-year time horizons at varying levels of HIV seropositivity awareness. Because HIV transmission rates are several times higher for those who are unaware of their HIV seropositivity than for those who are aware, we modeled the effects of increasing awareness via HIV counseling and testing and moving people from the higher to the lower transmission category. RESULTS: Increasing awareness of HIV seropositivity via HIV counseling and testing in the United States from a baseline 75% to 95% has the potential of reducing new infections by as much as 32% in a single year. Achieving the national goal of 50% reduction seems out of reach, however. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of new infections by 50% in the United States requires a combination of prevention services to reduce further the already low HIV transmission rate from persons aware of their HIV seropositivity and HIV risk reduction interventions for at-risk persons. Counseling and testing alone seems insufficient to meet the 50% incidence reduction goal.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed2007

Estimating HIV incidence in voluntary counseling and testing clients in Uganda (1992-2003).

OBJECTIVES: To estimate HIV incidence from first-time testers among voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clients in Uganda. METHODS: Data on 203,000 VCT clients tested from 1992 through 2003 were adjusted for temporal changes in the testing population. Differential mortality rates by HIV status were used to derive expected prevalence at future times from baseline prevalence within 5-year birth cohorts. Incidence was computed as the proportion of HIV-uninfected persons who seroconverted divided by the proportion negative at baseline. RESULTS: Annual HIV incidence per 100 uninfected persons increased from 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8 to 1.1) in 1993 to 2.3 (95% CI: 2.2 to 2.5) in 2003 (chi test for trend, P < 0.001). Prevalence decreased from 23% to 13% in 1999 to 2000 and increased to 15% in 2003. Women had a higher incidence. Peak incidence shifted to older age groups over time. CONCLUSIONS: Estimating incidence from routine data presents a practical way of tracking HIV incidence and is a useful tool in targeting and evaluating the impact of prevention programs. Our analysis reveals a new phase of the HIV epidemic in Uganda: decreasing prevalence and increasing incidence, especially among middle-aged persons. These findings support the need for intensified prevention interventions among middle-aged persons in Uganda.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗