PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12804001

HIV type 1 DNA development during long-term supervised therapy interruption.

Abstract

We studied the pattern of HIV-1 DNA development and the association to other HIV-related factors during long-term supervised therapy interruption (LT-STI). Fifteen patients were treated with long-time protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy (PI-ART). They had HIV-1 RNA at <50 copies/ml over 33.4 (SD 9.5) months and CD4(+) cell counts of 875 (SD 415) x 10(6)/liter. A real-time polymerase chain reaction, amplifying fragments of the HIV-1 pol gene and the human albumin gene simultaneously, was used to quantify HIV-1 DNA molecules in CD4(+) cells. The quantity of HIV-1 DNA in CD4(+) cells increased during LT-STI in all 15 patients, with an average doubling time of 2 months. Tentatively, three patterns were observed: rapid initial increase with subsequent stabilizing levels, rapid continuous increase, and slow increase. The HIV-1 DNA slope was positively related to the HIV-1 RNA maximum and steady state level and the baseline HIV-1 DNA value. It was inversely related to the decrease in CD4(+) cells both before the start of PI-ART and during the LT-STI. To conclude, HIV-1 DNA persists in infected CD4(+) cells despite long-term effective PI-ART and will increase after therapy interruption. The most important clinical predictor of long-term STI failure was the rapid CD4(+) cell decline before PI-ART. In patients with a steep pre-PI-ART slope it may be prudent to continue treatment and not initiate therapy interruption.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lars E Eriksson, Kerstin I Falk, Göran A Bratt, Ann-Charlotte Leandersson, Britta Wahren, Thomas Leitner. 2003. HIV type 1 DNA development during long-term supervised therapy interruption.. https://doi.org/10.1089/088922203764969456

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Drug resistance mutations in HIV provirus are associated with defective proviral genomes with hypermutation.

BACKGROUND: HIV proviral sequencing overcomes the limit of plasma viral load requirement by detecting all the 'archived mutations', but the clinical relevance remains to be evaluated. METHODS: We included 25 participants with available proviral sequences (both intact and defective sequences available) and utilized the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) to evaluate the level of resistance in their provirus and plasma virus. Defective sequences were further categorized as sequences with and without hypermutations. Personalized GSS score and total GSS score were calculated to evaluate the level of resistance to a whole panel of antiretroviral therapies and to certain antiretroviral therapy that a participant was using. The rate of sequences with drug resistance mutations (DRMs) within each sequence compartment (intact, defective and plasma viral sequences) was calculated for each participant. RESULTS: Defective proviral sequences harbored more DRMs than other sequence compartments, with a median DRM rate of 0.25 compared with intact sequences (0.0, P&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.014) and plasma sequences (0.095, P&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.30). Defective sequences with hypermutations were the major source of DRMs, with a median DRM rate of 1.0 compared with defective sequences without hypermutations (0.042, P&#x200a;<&#x200a;0.001). Certain Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3-related DRMs including reverse transcriptase gene mutations M184I, E138K, M230I, G190E and protease gene mutations M46I, D30N were enriched in hypermutated sequences but not in intact sequences or plasma sequences. All the hypermutated sequences had premature stop codons due to Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3. CONCLUSION: Proviral sequencing may overestimate DRMs as a result of hypermutations. Removing hypermutated sequences is essential in the interpretation of proviral drug resistance testing.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Diagnosis, antiretroviral therapy, and emergence of resistance to antiretroviral agents in HIV-2 infection: a review.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2) are the causative agents of AIDS. HIV-2 is prevalent at moderate to high rates in West African countries, such as Senegal, Guinea, Gambia, and Cape Verde. Diagnosis of HIV-2 is made with a positive HIV-1/HIV-2 ELISA or simple/rapid assay, followed by one or two confirmatory tests specific for HIV-2. Following CD(4)(+)T cell counts, HIV-2 viral burden and clinical signs and symptoms of immunodeficiency are beneficial in monitoring HIV-2 disease progression. Although non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are ineffective in treating HIV-2, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors can be effective in dual and triple antiretroviral regimens. Their use can decrease HIV-2 viral load, increase CD(4)(+)T cell counts and improve AIDS-related symptoms. HIV-2 resistance to various nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors, including zidovudine, lamivudine, ritonivir and indinavir, has been identified in some HIV-2 infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. The knowledge of HIV-2 peculiarities, when compared to HIV-1, is crucial to helping diagnose and guide the clinician in the choice of the initial antiretroviral regimen and for monitoring therapy success.

Anti-HIV Agents↗