PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12806521

The triptan formulations: a critical evaluation.

Abstract

The migraine-specific triptans have revolutionized the treatment of migraine and are usually the drugs of choice to treat a migraine attack in progress. Different triptans are available in different strengths and formulations including oral tablets, orally disintegrating tablets, nasal sprays and subcutaneous injections. In Europe, sumatriptan is also available as a suppository. Specific differences among the triptans exist as evidenced by different pharmacological profiles including T1/2, Tmax, Cmax, AUC, metabolism, drug-drug interaction profiles, amongst other parameters. How or whether these differences translate to clinical efficacy and tolerability differences is not well differentiated. Clinical distinctions among these agents are subtle and proper choice of triptan requires attention to the specific characteristics of each individual patient, knowledge of patient preference, accurate history of the efficacy of previous acute care medications as well as individual features of the drug being considered. Delivery systems may play an important role in the onset of action of triptans. The selection of an acute antimigraine drug for a patient depends upon the stratification of the patient's migraine attack by peak intensity, time to peak intensity, level of associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, time to associated symptoms, comorbid diseases, and concomitant treatments that might cause drug-drug interactions. The clinician has in his armamentarium an ever-expanding variety of medications, available in multiple formulations and dosages, with good safety and tolerability profiles. Continued clinical use will yield familiarity with the various triptans, and it should become possible for the interested physician to match individual patient needs with the specific characteristics of a triptan to optimize therapeutic benefit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marcelo E Bigal, Carlos A Bordini, Ana L Antoniazzi, José G Speciali. 2003-06-09. The triptan formulations: a critical evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2003000200032

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Disruption of the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor gene suppresses the morphine-induced antinociception in the mouse.

The present study was designed to investigate whether endoplasmic inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor-mediated intracellular signaling pathway could be involved in the morphine-induced antinociception in the mouse. An intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) pretreatment with xestospongin C (10-100 pmol per mouse, i.c.v.), a membrane permeable and selective antagonist for IP3 receptor, produced a dose-dependent reduction in the supraspinal antinociceptive effect produced by i.c.v. administration of morphine (0.3-10 nmol). In addition, the dose-response curve for morphine-induced antinociception was significantly shifted to the right by i.c.v. pretreatment with xestospongin C at 100 pmol. In the present study, we confirmed that the IP3R1 mRNA in opisthonos (opt) heterozygote mice was approximately 50% reduced as compared to that in wild-type mice. Under these conditions, a significant antinociception produced by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of morphine (5 mg/kg) observed in wild-type mice was markedly reduced in opt heterozygote mice. These findings suggest that IP3 receptor-, especially type 1 IP3 receptor-mediated intracellular signaling pathway may be implicated in the expression of antinociceptive effect induced by morphine in mice.

Analgesics↗

Nocistatin potentiates electroacupuncture antinociceptive effects and reverses chronic tolerance to electroacupuncture in mice.

Nocistatin (NST) and nociception/orphanin FQ (OFQ) are peptides derived from the same precursor that play opposing roles in pain modulation. OFQ antagonizes morphine analgesia and electroacupuncture (EA)-induced antinociceptive effect. The present study investigates whether NST potentiates EA-induced antinociceptive effect and reverses chronic tolerance to EA in mice. Injection of NST (0.5, 5.0 and 50.0 ng) intracerebroventricularly had no effect on basal thermal latency, but produced a dose-dependent potentiation of EA-induced antinociceptive effect in mice with the maximum response at 5.0 ng. NST (5.0 ng) partly reversed chronic tolerance to EA. These results suggest that NST in the brain might play roles in EA-induced antinociceptive effect and the development of chronic tolerance to EA in mice.

Analgesics↗

Effect of systemic FR140423, a new analgesic compound, in a rat model of postoperative pain: contribution of delta-opioid receptors.

We investigated the anti-hyperalgesic effect of FR140423, 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl-5-[4-(methylsulfinyl)phenyl]pyrazole, in a rat model of postoperative pain. Oral administration of FR140423 at doses between 1 and 100 mg/kg after surgery dose dependently attenuated the punctate mechanical hyperalgesia caused by an incision of the plantar surface of the hind paw with an ED50 value of 59 mg/kg. The anti-hyperalgesic effect of systematically administered FR140423 was blocked by naloxone, a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, the delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (0.2 mg/kg) reversed anti-hyperalgesia induced by FR140423. Naloxonazine and nor-binaltorphimine failed to antagonize the anti-hyperalgesic effect of FR140423. The action of FR140423 differs from the naloxonazine-reversible anti-hyperalgesia induced by morphine. The present findings suggest that delta-opioid systems play a role in the rat anti-hyperalgesia produced by FR140423 for postoperative pain characterized by mechanical hyperalgesia.

Analgesics↗