PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12811455

X-ray microscopy: methods and perspectives.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gerd Schneider. 2003-06-17. X-ray microscopy: methods and perspectives.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2007-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A case of non-selective phagocytosis of hemosiderin and melanin of dermal histiocytes in stasis dermatitis.

A case study was undertaken to determine whether or not the same dermal histiocytes could phagocytose both melanin and hemosiderin simultaneously. A biopsy specimen was taken from a pigmented lesion of the lower leg of a 57-year-old woman with stasis dermatitis. The specimen was processed for histology, conventional transmission electron microscopy and electron-probe X-ray microanalysis. Histologically, numerous histiocytes with their cytoplasm packed with either Prussian blue-positive granules or Fontana-Masson-positive granules were distributed almost equally in the dermis. Electron microscopically, the dermis had many histiocytes with their cytoplasm containing solitary or compound electron-dense substances. The electron-dense substances were classified into three types according to their degree of electron density. By electron-probe X-ray microanalysis, these electron-dense substances were classified into iron-containing and non-iron-containing substances. Both substances were seen in the cytoplasm of the same histiocytes and even in the same compound electron-dense substance. The former were siderosomes and the latter were probably melanosomes. These results show that the same dermal histiocytes probably phagocytose non-selectively both hemosiderin and melanin granules.

Electron Probe Microanalysis↗

Application of high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy, scanning transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, and energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy to the characterization of nanoparticles in the environment.

A major challenge to the development of a fundamental understanding of transport and retardation mechanisms of trace metal contaminants (<10 ppm) is their identification and characterization at the nanoscale. Atomic-scale techniques, such as conventional transmission electron microscopy, although powerful, are limited by the extremely small amounts of material that are examined. However, recent advances in electron microscopy provide a number of new analytical techniques that expand its application in environmental studies, particularly those concerning heavy metals on airborne particulates or water-borne colloids. High-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), STEM-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX), and energy-filtered TEM (EFTEM) can be effectively used to identify and characterize nanoparticles. The image contrast in HAADF-STEM is strongly correlated to the atomic mass: heavier elements contribute to brighter contrast. Gold nanocrystals in pyrite and uranium nanocrystals in atmospheric aerosols have been identified by HAADF-STEM and STEM-EDX mapping and subsequently characterized by high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). EFTEM was used to identify U and Fe nanocrystals embedded in an aluminosilicate. A rare, As-bearing nanophase, westerveldite (FeAs), was identified by STEM-EDX and HRTEM. The combined use of these techniques greatly expands the effective application of electron microscopy in environmental studies, especially when applied to metals of very low concentrations. This paper describes examples of how these electron microbeam techniques can be used in combination to characterize a low concentration of heavy metals (a few ppm) on nanoscale particles.

Electron Probe Microanalysis↗

Characterization of as-received, retrieved, and recycled stainless steel brackets.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the composition and to assess the microhardness and structure of as received, retrieved, and recycled stainless steel brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: New, used, and recycled brand-, slot size-, and prescription-matched appliances were subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive (EDS) electron probe microanalysis, metallographic analysis, and Vickers microhardness testing. Elemental analysis was performed on randomly selected bulk material base and wing areas. Basic metal content and microhardness results were statistically analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test, with treatment (as received, retrieved, and recycled) and bracket region (base, wing) serving as discriminating variables (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The results showed that there was no alteration in the bulk composition of the brackets among the three conditions. In contrast, differences were noted between bracket base and wing with respect to elemental composition among all groups, implying that the base and wings were manufactured from different alloys. The metallographic etching identified no difference in grain structure between the bracket base and wing components for all groups, regardless of treatment. Vickers microhardness demonstrated significant differences in hardness between base and wing for all groups and between recycled and retrieved states for the wing component.

Electron Probe Microanalysis↗