PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12816684

[Multicenter study on screen method for gestational diabetes].

Lian-fang Wu·Dong-yan Liu·Xing-hua Huang·Xiu-song Zu·Min Yang·Wei-jing Liu·Zong-hua Heng·Xin-zuo Chi·Xiao-fang Jia·Min-hua Hu
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of using random blood glucose to screen gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHOD: The random blood glucose was determined in 1 038 pregnant women between 24 and 32 gestational weeks. Then 50 gram glucose challenge test (50 g GCT) was performed followed immediately. Finally, 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test (75 g OGTT) was done without dietary control for 3 days. If two values of four were abnormal, GDM was diagnosed. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was diagnosed if only one value was abnormal or the 2nd hour value ranged from 120 to 164 mg/dl. RESULTS: (1) The determination of the three steps was completed in 948 cases. Among them, 42 cases (4.4%) were GDM, 372 cases (39.2%) were IGT and other 534 cases were normal. (2) In the normal group, the random blood glucose were different in fasting and postprandial times. No difference was found among blood glucose values determined of 50 g GCT at different times except that the value of 50 g GCT 1 hour postprandial was higher than the value at other times. There was no significant association between random blood glucose and 50 g GCT. (3) The sensitivity and specificity were 50.0% and 67.7%, when IGT was diagnosed using the cut point of 6.4 mmol/L (115 mg/dl) of random blood glucose, which was similar with 51.1% of sensitivity and 71.2% of specificity when using >or= 7.8 mmoL/L (140 mg/dl) as the cut point of 50 g GCT. If 6.4 mmol/L (115 mg/dl) was used as the cut point in GDM group the sensitivity would be 80.0%, which was much higher than that of IGT group and the specificity was 61.2%. In this study, if the value of >or= 8.3 mmoL/L (150 mg/dl) was used as the cut-point of 50 g GCT to screen the GDM, the sensitivity decreased only 2.0% while the specificity increased more than 10.0%. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The determination of random blood glucose to screen GDM couldn't replace the 50 g GCT, but it can be used as a complemental method and can be used repeatedly at any gestational age and convenience the pregnant women and the doctors. (2) The value of 8.3 mmol/L (150 mg/dl) was used as the cut-point of 50 g GCT, the specificity would be increased and the requirement for OGTT would be lowered markedly, which would reduce economic and psychological stress.

Explore related subjects

AdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMass ScreeningPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSensitivity and SpecificityEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleMulticenter Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lian-fang Wu, Dong-yan Liu, Xing-hua Huang, Xiu-song Zu, Min Yang, Wei-jing Liu, Zong-hua Heng, Xin-zuo Chi, Xiao-fang Jia, Min-hua Hu. 2003. [Multicenter study on screen method for gestational diabetes].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12816684/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

[Analysis of clinical phenotypes and pathogenicity of a c.4476+5G>T variant of SCN1A gene in a Chinese pedigree affected with Genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the pathogenicity and characteristics of a heterozygous splicing variant of SCN1A gene in a Chinese pedigree affected with Genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data and results of genetic testing of a GEFS+ pedigree consisting of 5 members who had visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University on July 1, 2024. Pathogenicity of the splicing variant of the SCN1A gene was validated with a minigene splicing assay. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Ethics No.: KS-2018-KY-36). RESULTS: The proband, a 24-year-old female, presented with FS in conjunct with focal seizures, and both of her younger brothers had Dravet syndrome. All of the three patients had carried a c.4476+5G>T variant of the SCN1A gene, which was unreported previously. Minigene experiment verified that the variant could cause loss of the first 7 bps of exon 24 and 138 bps from exon 23 of the SCN1A gene, resulting in alteration p.V1447_1495delfs*6 and affecting splicing. Based on the guidelines from American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the variant was predicted as likely pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting). CONCLUSION: The c.4476+5G>T variant at an intronic site of the SCN1A gene probably underlay the pathogenesis of GEFS+ in this pedigree.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Polygenic risk scores and lifestyle factors predicting new onset of type 2 diabetes in the Japanese general population.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the association of polygenic risk scores (PRS) and lifestyle factors with type 2 diabetes mellitus development in Japanese populations and evaluated whether PRS can improve diabetes risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study using the Shika resident cohort (n = 895) and the Toshiba worker cohort (n = 7019), respectively. Participants were categorized into low, intermediate, and high genetic risk groups using PRS constructed with genome-wide association study data from East Asian populations. We defined diabetes based on hemoglobin A1c, fasting blood glucose, self-reported diagnosis, or medication use. The associations of PRS and lifestyle factors with diabetes development were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Higher PRS were associated with increased diabetes risk in both cohorts (resident cohort: odds ratio 4.51, 95% CI 2.53-8.04; worker cohort: hazard ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.83 for high vs low PRS), which remained consistent across age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Regular exercise, absence of hypertension, and absence of dyslipidemia were associated with lower diabetes risk, particularly in the high PRS group. The addition of PRS to conventional prediction models improved the discrimination of diabetes risk. MAIN CONCLUSION: PRS are associated with diabetes risk in Japanese general populations, independent of traditional risk factors. Nonetheless, healthy lifestyle habits may reduce diabetes risk even among genetically susceptible individuals, which support the utility of PRS for personalized diabetes risk assessment and prevention strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of mitapivat in adults with transfusion-dependent α-thalassaemia or β-thalassaemia (ENERGIZE-T): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The absence of disease-modifying therapies for patients with α-thalassaemia and oral disease-modifying therapies for patients with β-thalassaemia has been a substantial unmet need in these patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of mitapivat, an oral allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase, in adults with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia. METHODS: ENERGIZE-T is a global, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, conducted across 19 countries in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East. Patients aged 18 years or older with transfusion-dependent α-thalassaemia or β-thalassaemia were randomly allocated (2:1) with a central interactive response technology system, stratified by geographical region and thalassaemia genotype, to receive 100 mg mitapivat or placebo orally twice a day for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was transfusion reduction response (TRR), defined as a reduction of at least 50% in transfused red blood cell units with a reduction of at least two units in any consecutive 12-week period until week 48 compared with baseline. Efficacy was analysed in the full analysis set, comprising all randomly allocated patients. Type, severity, and relationship of adverse events and serious adverse events were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04770779) and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2021 and May 2, 2023, 305 patients were screened, of whom 258 were randomly allocated (median age 33·5 years [IQR 27·0-44·0]; 136 [53%] female and 122 [47%] male participants). Of 258 patients allocated, 238 (92%) completed the double-blind treatment period. All patients were required to have a safety follow-up approximately 4 weeks after the final dose of study drug, regardless of completion of the double-blind period or continuation into the open-label extension period. In the full analysis set, TRRs occurred in 52 (30%) of 171 patients in the mitapivat group and 11 (13%) of 87 in the placebo group (adjusted difference 18 percentage points [95% CI 8-27]; two-sided p=0·0003). The safety analysis set comprised 172 patients in the mitapivat group (including one patient allocated to the placebo group who received one dose of mitapivat in error) and 85 in the placebo group. Adverse events were reported in 155 (90%) patients treated with mitapivat and 71 (84%) treated with placebo; the most common events with mitapivat were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, initial insomnia, diarrhoea, and fatigue. Serious adverse events were reported in 19 (11%) patients treated with mitapivat and 13 (15%) treated with placebo. Ten (6%) patients who received mitapivat and one (1%) who received placebo discontinued study treatment due to adverse events. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Mitapivat significantly reduced the transfusion burden and was generally well tolerated, showing a favourable benefit-risk profile. These findings support mitapivat as the first oral disease-modifying therapy for adults with transfusion-dependent α-thalassaemia or β-thalassaemia, providing a new treatment option to reduce transfusion burden in this patient population. FUNDING: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Adult↗