PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12834037

Non-invasive vascular imaging for erectile dysfunction.

Abstract

In the era of orally active agents the clinical context of the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) has radically changed. There is a general trend oriented towards choosing invasive diagnostic testing and surgical treatment solutions. Along this view, penile pharmacotesting (PPT) may represent an inexpensive and easy diagnostic procedure to be performed in the office setting. However, this procedure provides no direct vascular imaging, has a high percentage of false diagnoses and its accuracy for subsequent treatment decisions remains quite limited. Hence, home testing with orally active agents may provide better information for the patient's goals. In the diagnostic work-up of ED, the combination of PPT plus colour-duplex Doppler ultrasonography (CDDU) has gained more credit because of a higher diagnostic accuracy than PPT alone, so that it should be always performed when possible. It represents an accurate mean to predict cavernous artery inflow and venous leakage when compared to more invasive diagnostic techniques; in fact it allows the measurement of the resistive index when maximal response to vasodilator challenge has occurred. In conclusion, we recommend CDDU to all ED patients with a significant risk of cardiovascular disease, as well as in the presence of penile plaques whereas a frequent involvement of neuro-anatomical structures occurs. Other vascular testing--i.e. natural penile tumescence, cavernosometry/graphy, angiography are reserved to selected patients in whom CDDU alone has provided inconsistent information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Aversa, M Caprio, G Spera, A Fabbri. 2003. Non-invasive vascular imaging for erectile dysfunction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12834037/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Short history of erectile dysfunction treatment].

Since the origin, the man tried by all possible means to restor his erectile capacity. The obscurantism prevailed for a long time. We had to wait up to the turn of the 19th Century with Freud to get that things evolve a little bit. In the Fifties, the first penile prostheses were developed by Goodwin and Scott. In the Sixties, the behavioral therapies by Masters and Johnson. The Eighties represent the pharmacological revolution with the discovery of the effects of papaverin by Virag, then the E1 prostaglandin by Ishii, as well as the inhibitors of the 5 phospho di esterase (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) following studies on nitric oxide by Ignarro, Nobel Prize of medicine in 1998.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the volume of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) performed by urologists in the USA, and the physician characteristics that predict RP volume, as previous studies showed that individual surgeon volume for RP is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a nationwide, representative survey of 2000 urologists who treat prostate carcinoma in the USA, we asked respondents to indicate a numerical range of RPs they perform each year (none, 1-10, 11-30, and >30, the last which we defined as 'high volume'). We then identified characteristics of the provider and practice associated with a high volume of RPs. Supplementing survey results with other national data, we estimated the proportion of all RPs in the USA performed by 'high-volume' urologists. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.1% (1313 urologists) with no differences between the respondents and non-respondents for the measured demographic variables. Among urologists who performed RPs (89.1% of the sample), 37.3% did < or = 10, 46.9% 11-30 and 15.8% >30 RPs/year. Academic and urological oncology fellowship-trained urologists were, respectively, 41% and 27% more likely than private-practice and non-fellowship-trained urologists to have a high volume of RPs. Of all RPs performed yearly in the USA, only an estimated 46.1% were by high-volume urologists. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of urologists report a RP volume that might be associated with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound-healing, and genitourinary complications. Further study is needed to characterize the possible relationships between RP volume and tumour recurrence, survival, and long-term erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

Erectile Dysfunction↗