PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12849399

When should temporal-lobe epilepsy be treated surgically?

Abstract

Our current knowledge of mesial-temporal-lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is extensive, yet still insufficient to draw final conclusions on the optimal approach to its therapy. MTLE has been well characterised and can usually be identified with noninvasive studies including scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and video monitoring with ictal recording, magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon-emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, neuropsychological assessment, and historical and clinical data. Sometimes, invasive EEG is needed to confirm mesial-temporal-lobe seizure onset, which, combined with the underlying pathological abnormality (the substrate) of mesial temporal sclerosis (hippocampal neuronal loss and gliosis), defines MTLE. This disorder is the most common refractory partial epilepsy, and also the one most often treated surgically, because medical treatment fails in 75% of cases, and surgical treatment succeeds in a similar percentage. Despite the recent publication of the first randomised trial of surgical treatment for MTLE, questions remain about the neurological consequences of both medical and surgical treatment, the ultimate gains in quality of life parameters, and the precise predictors of success. Long-term follow-up and analyses of multiple factors in large groups of contemporary patient populations will be necessary to fully answer the question, "is temporal lobe epilepsy a surgical disease?" Right now it should be considered one in most cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Susan S Spencer. 2002. When should temporal-lobe epilepsy be treated surgically?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00163-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗