PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12855249

Spatial frequency processing in inferred PC- and MC-pathways.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the role of inferred parvocellular (PC) and magnocellular (MC) pathways in spatial contrast sensitivity. Localized, spatially narrow-band patterns (sixth derivatives of Gaussians, D6s) were presented at various peak spatial frequencies. When the D6 appeared on a pulsed luminance pedestal (Pulsed-Pedestal Paradigm), the spatial contrast sensitivity showed a band-pass shape with good contrast sensitivity at medium spatial frequencies. When the D6 appeared on a steady luminance pedestal (Steady-Pedestal Paradigm), the spatial contrast sensitivity showed a low-pass shape with decreased sensitivity at high spatial frequencies. The band-pass CSF was interpreted as reflecting PC-pathway mediation; the lower spatial frequency region of the low-pass CSF as reflecting MC-pathway mediation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna Leonova, Joel Pokorny, Vivianne C Smith. 2003. Spatial frequency processing in inferred PC- and MC-pathways.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00333-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

When a target stimulus is embedded in a high contrast surround, the target appears reduced in contrast and is harder to detect, and neural responses in visual cortex are suppressed. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysics to quantitatively compare these physiological and perceptual effects. Observers performed a contrast discrimination task on a contrast-reversing sinusoidal target grating. The target was either presented in isolation or embedded in a high-contrast surround. While observers performed the task, we also measured fMRI responses as a function of target contrast, both with and without a surround. We found that the surround substantially increased the psychophysical thresholds while reducing fMRI responses. The two data sets were compared, on the basis of the assumption that a fixed response difference is required for correct discrimination, and we found that the psychophysics accounted for 96.5% of the variance in the measured V1 responses. The suppression in visual areas V2 and V3 was stronger, too strong to agree with psychophysics. The good quantitative agreement between psychophysical thresholds and V1 responses suggests V1 as a plausible candidate for mediating surround masking.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing.

Centre-surround receptive field organization is a ubiquitous property in mammalian visual systems, presumably tailored for extracting image features that are differentially distributed over space. In visual motion, this is evident as antagonistic interactions between centre and surround regions of the receptive fields of many direction-selective neurons in visual cortex. In a series of psychophysical experiments we make the counterintuitive observation that increasing the size of a high-contrast moving pattern renders its direction of motion more difficult to perceive and reduces its effectiveness as an adaptation stimulus. We propose that this is a perceptual correlate of centre-surround antagonism, possibly within a population of neurons in the middle temporal visual area. The spatial antagonism of motion signals observed at high contrast gives way to spatial summation as contrast decreases. Evidently, integration of motion signals over space depends crucially on the visibility of those signals, thereby allowing the visual system to register motion information efficiently and adaptively.

Contrast Sensitivity↗