PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12859256

Physicians' liability in ophthalmology practice.

Anna Mavroforou·Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this paper are to point out the importance of coherence in established guidelines in daily practice, highlight the value of signed patient informed consent forms and stress the value of a good understanding of the law, while focusing on issues related to malpractice in ophthalmology. METHODS: Search of the current relevant literature. RESULTS: The most common causes of medical litigation in ophthalmology are related to LASIK surgery, cataract surgery, glaucoma care, radial keratotomy for myopia reduction and failure to diagnose binocular vision anomalies in children and adults in a timely fashion. The litigation raised in most cases is driven by unfavourable outcomes and not by malpractice. CONCLUSION: Maintenance of high standards in daily practice, with continuous training and clear communication along with the appropriate documentation of any procedure carried out, may improve the professional safety of practising eye specialists in the event of medical litigation. Although the use of patient informed consent varies substantially among European countries, it may serve as useful evidence in the physician's defence.

Explore related subjects

Consent FormsDiagnostic ErrorsDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalEuropeHumansInformed ConsentLiability, LegalMalpracticeMedical ErrorsOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresOphthalmologyPhysician's RolePractice Guidelines as TopicProfessional PracticeUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna Mavroforou, Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis. 2003. Physicians' liability in ophthalmology practice.. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00111.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Migrant Latino day laborers and intentions to test for HIV.

This cross sectional study utilized convenience sampling to investigate the HIV testing intentions of 290 sexually active, male, migrant Latino day laborers, 18 years old or older. The findings indicate that day laborers are indeed at risk for HIV. Nearly two-thirds of the men intended to test for HIV in the next year. Men who were at higher risk of infection from their sexual encounters with female partners were more likely to intend to test, as were men making less money and men who did not perceive themselves to be at risk. Men who attended high school or beyond, and reported using a condom with casual female partners, were much more likely to intend to test than men who did not attend school and reported no such condom use. The prevalence of high risk sex and the low rates of condom use have implications for the increased transmission of HIV.

Consent Forms↗
PubMed2006

Patients' perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' understanding of the status, function, and remit of written consent to surgery. DESIGN: Prospective questionnaire study. Questionnaires were sent to patients within one month of surgery. Responses were analysed with frequencies and single variable analyses. SETTING: Large teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 732 patients who had undergone surgery in obstetrics and gynaecology over a six month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' awareness of the legal implications of written consent and their views on the function and remit of the consent form. RESULTS: Patients had limited understanding of the legal standing of written consent. Nearly half (46%, 95% confidence interval 43% to 50%) of patients believed the primary function of consent forms was to protect hospitals and 68% (65% to 71%) thought consent forms allowed doctors to assume control. Only 41% (37% to 44%) of patients believed consent forms made their wishes known. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients seem to have limited awareness of the legal implications of signing or not signing consent forms, and they do not recognise written consent as primarily serving their interests. Current consent procedures seem inadequate as a means for the expression of autonomous choice, and their ethical standing and credibility can be called into question.

Consent Forms↗