PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12867307

Success changes the problem: why ventricular fibrillation is declining, why pulseless electrical activity is emerging, and what to do about it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Programs for research and practice in resuscitation have focused on identification and reversal of ventricular fibrillation (VF). While substantial progress has been achieved, evidence is accumulating that clinical death is less likely to be caused by fibrillation now than in the 1960s and 1970s. Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) has emerged as the most common rhythm found in arrests in the hospital and is rapidly rising in pre-hospital reports. PURPOSE: To identify the magnitude of changes occurring, search for potential explanations from population and clinical epidemiology and present the data available regarding etiology and treatment of PEA. DATA SOURCES: Synthesis of material from population epidemiology, clinical epidemiology, animal and human research on VF and PEA. CONCLUSIONS: VF is a manifestation of severe, undiagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD). Rates of death from CAD increased from rare in 1930 to become the most common cause of death in the US. CAD death rates peaked in the early 1960s and had declined over 50% by the late 1990s. Primary and secondary prevention, early diagnosis and aggressive, successful treatment have contributed to this decline. PEA is a brief phase in clinical death that occurs after losses in consciousness, ventilatory drive and circulation but before decay to asystole; survival rates are poor. PEA is a common stage in clinical death from any of a variety of tissue hypoxic/anoxic insults. Research on PEA is needed; 50 years of attention to CAD and VF have resulted in improved survival and changed the disease spectrum. Similar attention to animal and clinical research on PEA may have the potential to improve survival.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David C Parish, K M Dinesh Chandra, Francis C Dane. 2003. Success changes the problem: why ventricular fibrillation is declining, why pulseless electrical activity is emerging, and what to do about it.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00104-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of ventilation and chest compression performance by bystanders using the Impact Model 730 ventilator and a conventional bag valve with mask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest.

"Bystanders" or lay persons are typically the first caregivers to attend to a victim of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Astronaut crew medical officers (CMO) play a similar role to bystanders aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Studies have demonstrated the importance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) for patient survival before the arrival of emergency medical care. Recent apprehension from bystanders about the threat of contracting communicable diseases during BCPR, however, has led to the consideration of other ventilation systems such as the bag-valve mask (BVM) and automatic transport ventilators (ATV). BVM use is called for during CPR aboard the ISS. This study evaluated the ventilation and compression performance of 40 basic CPR-trained bystanders using either a BVM (adult-sized self-inflating bag with face mask) or an ATV (Model 730 ventilator (M730), Impact Instrumentation, Inc., West Caldwell, NJ). Each two-bystander team gave BCPR to a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest victim using the 2-breath/15-compression cycle for 4 min and then switched roles for another 4-min interval. Compared to BVM use, the M730 led to significantly (p<0.05) lower number of breaths, smaller tidal volumes, airway flows, airway pressures, volume of gas entering the stomach per breath and chest compressions for the 4-min period. The M730 also enabled a bystander to meet the recommendation of 4-breath and compression cycles per minute as per Guidelines 2000. Lastly, ease-of-use scores were significantly higher for the M730 compared to the BVM. Overall, the data suggest that the M730 improves the quality of performance for a bystander performing BCPR.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗