PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12871922

Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.

Abstract

The identification of genotyping errors is an important issue in mapping complex disease genes. Although it is common practice to genotype multiple markers in a candidate region in genetic studies, the potential benefit of jointly analyzing multiple markers to detect genotyping errors has not been investigated. In this article, we discuss genotyping error detections for a set of tightly linked markers in nuclear families, and the objective is to identify families likely to have genotyping errors at one or more markers. We make use of the fact that recombination is a very unlikely event among these markers. We first show that, with family trios, no extra information can be gained by jointly analyzing markers if no phase information is available, and error detection rates are usually low if Mendelian consistency is used as the only standard for checking errors. However, for nuclear families with more than one child, error detection rates can be greatly increased with the consideration of more markers. Error detection rates also increase with the number of children in each family. Because families displaying Mendelian consistency may still have genotyping errors, we calculate the probability that a family displaying Mendelian consistency has correct genotypes. These probabilities can help identify families that, although showing Mendelian consistency, may have genotyping errors. In addition, we examine the benefit of available haplotype frequencies in the general population on genotyping error detections. We show that both error detection rates and the probability that an observed family displaying Mendelian consistency has correct genotypes can be greatly increased when such additional information is available.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guohua Zou, Deyun Pan, Hongyu Zhao. 2003. Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics%2F164.3.1161

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of association of SNPs in the TNF alpha gene region with schizophrenia.

The association of the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) -G308A promoter polymorphism with schizophrenia has complemented clinical findings of increased levels of the TNFalpha cytokine in schizophrenic patients, with some support for a functional consequence of the variant. Our previous studies of genetic causes in schizophrenia supported findings of linkage to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region where the TNFalpha gene is located as well as association with the -G308A promoter polymorphism. While the common G-allele shows association in our sample, association with the A-allele has been reported by other groups. This suggests linkage disequilibrium (LD) rather than direct involvement in the disorder. In order to define LD of DNA variants with the disorder in this area, we analyzed 36 SNPs in a 165-kb region around this polymorphism. We detected nominally significant associations (P < 0.05) of three markers (including the -G308A promoter polymorphism) and multiple haplotypes with schizophrenia in our sample of 204 families (79 sib-pairs and 125 trios). The association is largely restricted to a 30 kb high LD region/block and should assist in the identification of a schizophrenia susceptibility gene within the block or elsewhere in the MHC.

Family↗

Validity, reliability and objectivity of the family history method in psychiatry: a meta analysis.

BACKGROUND: The family history is a widely used method in psychiatry; but data on the method's objectivity, reliability and validity shows partly diverging results. METHOD: In October 2005, a Medline search was conducted that yielded 7 studies regarding objectivity/reliability and 13 studies regarding validity. Results for six main groups of psychiatric diagnoses and any mental disorder were combined qualitatively for objectivity/reliability, and quantitatively for validity. RESULTS: Objectivity was generally high (kappa in the 0.80 range). Reliability was high for any mental disorder, schizophrenia, substance abuse and depression (kappa in the 0.70 range), and low or medium for anxiety (kappa between 0.30 and 0.50). Results on validity displayed an OR=148 for the family history for schizophrenia; OR=64 for mania/bipolar disorder; and OR's between 8 and 194 for substance abuse, between 3 and 37 for depression, between 5 and 350 for personality disorders, between 2.5 and 49 for anxiety, and between 2.4 and 9 for any mental disorder. CONCLUSION: There is clear evidence that the family history provides results that are better than chance for all disorders examined. But variance among diagnostic groups and among studies is considerable.

Family↗

Familial recurrence of congenital heart disease: an overview and review of the literature.

Familial recurrence is one of the classic patterns for the clinical presentation of congenital heart disease (CHD). In recent years, many groups studied empiric recurrence risk in these heart defects, and the aim of this review was to analyse the patterns of inheritance detected in different types of CHD, including atrioventricular canal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, left-sided obstructions and atrial septal defect. These studies may influence clinical practise guidelines through accurate genetic counselling, but also, they may have important implications in the knowledge of genetic and pathogenetic mechanisms of CHD.

Family↗