PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12877369

Action research on own practice. Methodological challenges.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using experiences from a study on clinical communication, the objective was to clarify the methodological challenges that general practitioners are faced with when researching their own practice. DESIGN: A case study of the methodological challenges of an action research project in which the researcher is both participating observer and observing participator. The material comprised notes and transcripts from audiotapes, and was investigated with a view to highlighting experiences that might facilitate the research process. SETTING: The practice of the author. SUBJECTS: 36 consultations with 16 patients during which the illness diary method was applied. RESULTS: The challenges of the project are presented as turning-point stories, i.e. stories demonstrating relations, perspective shifts and metapositions. Perspective shifts were established by introspection through dialogues with oneself, and by relation to helpers through dialogues with patients and supervisors. Reflexivity was promoted by combining pictures from different perspectives. CONCLUSION: It is possible and sensible to study oneself in interaction. The information gained from carefully designed research in one's own practice could be an underestimated source of valuable knowledge about the personal and existential aspects of clinical medicine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Per Stensland. 2003. Action research on own practice. Methodological challenges.. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430310001653

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A case for more year-long internships outside metropolitan areas?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether medical graduates who spent their intern year at a non-metropolitan hospital were more likely to practise outside metropolitan areas on completion of training than were interns in metropolitan hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up of doctors who held year-long internships at a non-metropolitan hospital and interns from metropolitan hospitals. SETTING: Ballarat Base Hospital (BBH) (Rural, Remote and Metropolitan Area [RRMA] rural zone) and hospitals in Melbourne and Geelong (RRMA metropolitan zone). PARTICIPANTS: 57/63 (90%) Victorian medical graduates completing internships at BBH between 1989 and 1997 and 126/126 (100%) sex-matched metropolitan interns, chosen at random. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Practice location in 2002. RESULTS: More BBH interns were practising as GPs outside metropolitan areas (44%) than metropolitan interns (13%) (difference, 31%; 95% CI, 17%-45%). The proportion of interns in specialist practice outside metropolitan areas was small for both groups - zero and 3%, respectively (difference, - 3%; 95% CI, - 6% to 0). None of the specialist training posts held by interns were outside metropolitan areas. Of BBH interns entering general practice, 41% (95% CI, 24%-58%) did so in the local health region. CONCLUSIONS: Regional interns are a good source of non-metropolitan GPs, especially locally. Prospective studies to determine the precise influence of regional internships on eventual practice location, and whether more such posts would lead to more graduates entering non-metropolitan practice, would be worthwhile.

Family Practice↗