PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12890440

Validating clinical reasoning: a question of perspective, but whose perspective?

A M Downing·D G Hunter
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper explores the notion of validity from different perspectives and addresses its integration with clinical reasoning. Whilst valuing the evidence-based practice (EBP) perspective in our quest for validation of practice, the authors posit that other perspectives may provide added value through their potential for offering validity in differing circumstances. The reality of the EBP aspiration is discussed and nuances within the evolved term 'research-enhanced practice' are shared. Validity theory applied through different perspectives may, it is argued help to get to grips with the balancing act of validating manual therapy practice.

Explore related subjects

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMusculoskeletal ManipulationsPhysical Therapy SpecialtyPractice Guidelines as TopicQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Downing, D G Hunter. 2003. Validating clinical reasoning: a question of perspective, but whose perspective?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1356-689x(02)00077-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2007

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗