PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12904717

New observations on pulmonary function changes in sarcoidosis.

Abstract

Respiratory tract involvement occurs at some time during the course of most patients with sarcoidosis. There are many articles on lung function impairment in sarcoidosis, but the definite, unique guideline considering the correlation between the clinical, radiologic, and biochemical findings of the disease is lacking. During the last few years, most of the literature has focused on follow-up studies, presenting primarily the effects of the treatment on lung function impairment in patients with sarcoidosis. This study focuses on airflow impairment, diffusion impairment, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in sarcoidosis. The topic has already been explored, but this time the authors emphasize lung function impairment and its correlation with the course of the disease. Considering the course of sarcoidosis, a significantly higher number of patients with diffusion impairment have the chronic form of the disease. The bronchial challenge test (BCT) was performed in patients with chronic sarcoidosis at the time they experienced relapse of disease activity. A high number of patients with positive BCT is significant in light of their disease. Further analyses, not only functional, but immunologic, are necessary to examine the potential correlation between positive BCT and the activity of sarcoidosis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Violeta Mihailovic-Vucinic, Vladimir Zugic, Jelica Videnovic-Ivanov. 2003. New observations on pulmonary function changes in sarcoidosis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063198-200309000-00017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Capsaicin cough sensitivity in bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is a suppurative airway disease characterised by persistent cough and sputum production associated with bronchial dilatation. A study was undertaken to determine whether cough sensitivity is increased in bronchiectatic patients. METHODS: Twenty two patients with bronchiectasis and 20 healthy non-smoking controls matched for age and sex were recruited into the study. Quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire score), total cough symptom score, and extent of bronchiectasis on HRCT scans were recorded. Cough sensitivity was assessed using incremental inhalation of capsaicin concentrations; the concentration at which 5 or more coughs occurred (C5) was recorded. RESULTS: Patients with bronchiectasis had increased sensitivity to capsaicin compared with controls (mean (SE) log10 C5 1.22 (0.20) v 1.89 (0.21); p<0.03). Capsaicin sensitivity correlated positively with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire score (r = 0.64; p = 0.005) and inversely with the total cough symptom score (r = -0.58; p = 0.004), but not with the extent of the disease. It also correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in litres (r = 0.58; p = 0.005) but not with FEV1 % predicted. Capsaicin sensitivity was not related to the presence of infected sputum or to corticosteroid or bronchodilator use. CONCLUSIONS: : Patients with bronchiectasis have a sensitive cough reflex which reflects the severity of cough symptoms. A measure of cough severity could be part of health assessment for patients with bronchiectasis.

Bronchial Provocation Tests↗

[Comparison of unspecific bronchial provocation during controlled and spontaneous inhalation].

Using controlled breathing patterns during inhalation of drugs is characterized by a high dose reproducibility which may be of advantage for bronchial provocation testing. In this study 30 healthy subjects with an anamnesis of atopy underwent in a randomized cross-over design bronchial provocation testing with methacholine either with the Viasys-Jäger-APS system or with controlled inhalations (AKITA-System) (controlled inhalation volume and flow). Measured was the frequency of positive test results. Positive test results were defined by a 20 % decline of FEV (1) or a 100 % increase of specific airway resistance (sRaw). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of positive test results obtained with both techniques: APS-FEV (1) : 8, AKITA-FEV (1) : 9; APS-sRaw: 18, AKITA-sRaw: 17. More subjects showed a 100 % increase of sRaw as compared to a 20 % decrease of FEV (1), which may be interesting in order to understand differences in the diagnostic information given by both parameters. However, there were some discrepancies: only in 25 of 30 cases (sRaw: 21 of 30 cases) the results (positive or negative) agreed between both techniques. Although the two techniques for bronchial provocation test showed some discrepancies, these data suggest that controlled inhalations may be an alternative to the APS-system.

Bronchial Provocation Tests↗