PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1290918

A method to evaluate and compare roentgenograms.

Abstract

A simple and practical method is suggested to evaluate and compare roentgenograms concerning optical density and contrast. The method is specifically indicated for research in which a metallic stepwedge penetrometer and a photodensitometer are used. A PC computer may be optionally employed for the mathematical and statistical processing of the data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G C Campos, J R Tamburús. 1992. A method to evaluate and compare roentgenograms.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1290918/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Type, severity, frequency and management of adverse reactions associated with ultrasound contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed at evaluating the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following administration of clinically approved ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in adults and children, to assess risks in patients with cardiovascular disease and in pregnancy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency management of severe ADRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality. Incidence estimates were pooled when feasible, stratified by age group, contrast agent, and administration route. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies encompassing >&#x2009;1 million adults and >&#x2009;36,000 children were included, contributing multiple analytic cohorts to the quantitative synthesis. Severe acute ADRs were extremely rare (6 and 16 cases per 100,000 in adults and children, respectively) and absent following endocavitary administration in children. Non-severe acute ADRs occurred in 11 and 8 cases per 10,000 adults and children, respectively. Delayed reactions were very rare (<&#x2009;1 case per million in adults). No significant safety differences emerged between UCA products. The incidence of ADRs in patients with cardiovascular disease was analogous to the general population. No ADRs were reported in pregnant women. Standard emergency management was effective in almost all serious cases, though rare fatalities occurred. CONCLUSION: UCAs show an excellent safety profile in adults and children, with very rare severe ADRs and few non-severe, typically self-limiting reactions. Strict adherence to recommended emergency management protocols mitigates the remaining risks, supporting safe use across a broad range of clinical indications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023432668. KEY POINTS: Question What is the incidence, type, and severity of acute and delayed ADRs associated with clinically approved UCAs across different patient populations? Findings Severe acute adverse reactions are very rare, and non-severe reactions are rare and self-limiting, with no significant safety differences between adults, children, or patients with cardiovascular disease. Clinical relevant UCAs show an excellent safety profile across populations. These findings support their safe clinical use as reliable alternatives to iodine-based and gadolinium-based contrast agents in routine diagnostic imaging.

Contrast Media↗

[Imaging modalities in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma].

Thorough clinical examination, endorectal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) are decisive tools in the pretherapeutic work-up of patients with rectal cancer. Depth of infiltration to the rectal wall as well as involvement of perirectal lymph nodes by the tumor are the key questions to be answered. To receive adequate information from imaging procedures, the right questions need to be asked. The extent of invasion of the rectal wall and exact location of tumor infiltration to neighboring structures can be demonstrated by MRI very well, particularly if imaging planes are acquired at 90 degrees to the position of the rectum. Recent developments in computed tomography (CT) using isotrope voxels allow three-dimensional reconstructions of tumors without loss of imaging quality. Assessment of the primary tumor and its nodal metastases after preoperative radio-(chemo-)therapy is still seriously limited. Fusion of positron emission tomography and CT could be a step towards solving the problem of response assessment in the near future.

Contrast Media↗