PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12917518

Investigations in erectile dysfunction.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This is an update of recent developments in the investigation of erectile dysfunction in the period since March 2002. RECENT FINDINGS: Three developments in the field of medical sexology redirected the approach towards the investigation of erectile dysfunction. First, the emergence of oral pharmacological therapy; second, the notion that sexual relationship issues have an important impact on the successful outcome of pharmacological therapy; and finally, the concept that erectile dysfunction is often a sequel or even a sentinel of cardiovascular disease. Consequently, the current evaluation of men with erectile dysfunction may be divided into two steps: a basic diagnostic evaluation for the majority of men, and specific diagnostic procedures for a small minority. The basic evaluation is aimed at the identification of the underlying pathological condition and erectile dysfunction-associated risk factors. Such screening may diagnose reversible causes of erectile dysfunction and also unmask medical and psychological conditions that manifest with erectile dysfunction. The basic evaluation consists of a comprehensive medical, sexual and psychosocial history and a physical examination. Patients who have failed first-line treatment or complicated cases qualify for specific diagnostic procedures, traditionally performed by urologists. SUMMARY: Current research into the investigation of erectile dysfunction emphasizes the notion that erectile dysfunction is often a result of an interplay between medical and psychosexual conditions. Recognition of the underlying conditions and an estimation of their relative contribution to the patient's and his partner's sexual problem are key issues in the current evaluation of the man with erectile dysfunction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eric J H Meuleman. 2003. Investigations in erectile dysfunction.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200309000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Short history of erectile dysfunction treatment].

Since the origin, the man tried by all possible means to restor his erectile capacity. The obscurantism prevailed for a long time. We had to wait up to the turn of the 19th Century with Freud to get that things evolve a little bit. In the Fifties, the first penile prostheses were developed by Goodwin and Scott. In the Sixties, the behavioral therapies by Masters and Johnson. The Eighties represent the pharmacological revolution with the discovery of the effects of papaverin by Virag, then the E1 prostaglandin by Ishii, as well as the inhibitors of the 5 phospho di esterase (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) following studies on nitric oxide by Ignarro, Nobel Prize of medicine in 1998.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the volume of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) performed by urologists in the USA, and the physician characteristics that predict RP volume, as previous studies showed that individual surgeon volume for RP is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a nationwide, representative survey of 2000 urologists who treat prostate carcinoma in the USA, we asked respondents to indicate a numerical range of RPs they perform each year (none, 1-10, 11-30, and >30, the last which we defined as 'high volume'). We then identified characteristics of the provider and practice associated with a high volume of RPs. Supplementing survey results with other national data, we estimated the proportion of all RPs in the USA performed by 'high-volume' urologists. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.1% (1313 urologists) with no differences between the respondents and non-respondents for the measured demographic variables. Among urologists who performed RPs (89.1% of the sample), 37.3% did < or = 10, 46.9% 11-30 and 15.8% >30 RPs/year. Academic and urological oncology fellowship-trained urologists were, respectively, 41% and 27% more likely than private-practice and non-fellowship-trained urologists to have a high volume of RPs. Of all RPs performed yearly in the USA, only an estimated 46.1% were by high-volume urologists. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of urologists report a RP volume that might be associated with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound-healing, and genitourinary complications. Further study is needed to characterize the possible relationships between RP volume and tumour recurrence, survival, and long-term erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

Erectile Dysfunction↗