Does your equipment maintenance management program measure up?

Deborah C Deinstadt

PubMed · 12918276

Does your equipment maintenance management program measure up?

Abstract

Identifying a clear maintenance philosophy is the first step toward choosing the right program for your healthcare organization. The second step is gaining a clear understanding of how proposed savings and improvements will be delivered. The third and last step is requiring that the proposed company or manager have specific tools in place for measuring and analyzing program performance. There are three primary philosophies underlying current equipment management options. These include risk-transfer philosophy (e.g., maintenance insurance, service contracts, multi-vendor and outsource programs), asset management philosophy (e.g., programs delivering a management system based on managed time-and-materials), and internal management (in-house managed programs). The last step in selecting the right program is insisting that proper performance measurements be built into the proposed management program. A well-managed program provides results in three general areas: financial outcomes, operational improvements and process improvements. Financial outcomes are the easiest to measure. Operational and process improvements are more challenging to assess but equally important to the program's overall success. To accurately identify results in these three areas, the overall management program should measure the following eight separate components: procedures and support for department staff; equipment inventory, benchmark costs, and budget guidelines; experienced equipment support team; objective, independent analysis of maintenance events; repair documentation and reporting; vendor relations; equipment acquisition analysis; and recommendations for improvement. Do everything you reasonably can to assure that the selected company can work side-by-side with you, providing objective, measurable advice that is ultimately in your best interest. You will then know that you have been thorough in your marketplace selection and can confidently move into implementation, expecting tangible and successful results.

Explore related subjects

Benchmarking Budgets Contract Services Decision Making, Organizational Diagnostic Imaging Efficiency, Organizational Forms and Records Control Maintenance and Engineering, Hospital Program Evaluation Radiology Department, Hospital United States Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Deborah C Deinstadt. Does your equipment maintenance management program measure up?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12918276/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Beyond benchmarking: an expert-guided consensus approach to spatially aware clustering.

Spatial omics technologies have revolutionized the study of tissue architecture and cellular heterogeneity by integrating molecular profiles with spatial localization. In spatially resolved transcriptomics, delineating higher-order anatomical structures is critical for understanding how cellular organization affects function. However, the reliability of current benchmarks of spatially aware clustering (SAC) methods is undermined by their narrow focus on Visium and brain tissue datasets and the incorrect interpretation of manual annotation as ground truth. Here we present SACCELERATOR, a community-driven, extensible framework that standardizes data formatting, method integration and metric evaluation, enabling rapid inclusion of new methods and datasets. Our analysis revealed substantial limitations in the generalizability and reproducibility of SAC methods and shows that anatomical labels commonly used as ground truths are often biased, error prone and unsuitable for benchmarking. Rather than ranking methods, we propose a consensus-guided workflow where descriptive spatial metrics highlight high-entropy regions of method disagreement, enabling targeted feedback for tissue experts. Applied to brain and cancer datasets, this approach uncovered biologically meaningful patterns overlooked by individual SAC methods and manual annotations, highlighting the need for iterative, expert-in-the-loop evaluation.

Benchmarking↗

PubMed2026

Essence: A benchmarking-validated transformer framework for early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. The lack of objective molecular biomarkers limits early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Here, we propose Essence, a benchmarking-validated framework integrating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics with traditional and deep learning models to identify robust protein signatures for PD. Using data from two independent cohorts, 1266 high-confidence proteins are quantified, among which 178 exhibit differential abundance between PD and healthy controls (HC). Through systematic benchmarking of ten machine learning algorithms and four neural architectures, the Transformer model consistently outperforms alternatives across multiple feature selection strategies, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 1.0000 with only 35 features. Functional analyses of the top-ranked 35 proteins reveal enrichment in neuroinflammatory, synaptic, and oxidative stress-related pathways. Importantly, spatial transcriptomic profiling based on the Allen Brain Atlas shows region-specific expression of these biomarkers in PD-relevant brain structures, including the striatum, subthalamic nucleus, hippocampus, and white matter tracts. This anatomical alignment supports the functional relevance of the identified markers and highlights their potential utility in early-stage diagnosis and mechanistic understanding of PD.

Benchmarking↗

PubMed2025

Benchmarking with synthetic communities provides a baseline for virus-host inferences from Hi-C proximity linking.

Microbiomes influence diverse ecosystems, and viruses increasingly appear to impose key constraints. While viromics has expanded genomic catalogs, host identification for these viruses remains challenging due to the limitations in scaling cultivation-based approaches and the uncertain reliability and relative low resolution of in silico predictions - particularly for understudied viral taxa. Towards this, Hi-C proximity ligation uses sequenced, cross-linked virus and host genomic fragments to infer virus-host linkages and has now been applied in at least 10 studies. However, its accuracy remains unknown. Here we assess Hi-C performance in recovering virus-host interactions using synthetic communities (SynComs) composed of four marine bacterial strains and nine phages with known interactions and then apply optimized bioinformatic protocols to natural soil samples. In SynComs, standard Hi-C sample preparations and analyses showed poor normalized contact score performance (26% specificity, 100% sensitivity, incorrect matches up to class level) that could be dramatically improved by Z-score filtering (Z ≥ 0.5, 99% specificity), though at reduced sensitivity (62% down from 100%). Detection limits were established as reproducibility was poor below minimal phage abundances of 105 PFU/mL. Applying optimized bioinformatic protocols to natural soil samples, we compared virus-host linkages inferred from proximity-ligated Hi-C sequencing with predictions generated by in silico homology-based and machine learning-based bioinformatic approaches. Prior to Z-score thresholding, agreement was relatively high at the phylum to family levels (72%), but not at the genus (43%) or species (15%) levels. Z-score thresholding reduced sensitivity (only 34% of predictions were retained), with only modest improvements in congruence with bioinformatic methods (48% or 18% at genus or species levels, respectively). Regardless, this led to 79 genus-level-congruent virus-host linkages and 293 new ones revealed by Hi-C alone, i.e., providing many new virus-host interactions to explore in already well-studied climate-critical soils. Overall, these findings provide empirical benchmarks and methodological guidelines to improve the accuracy and reliability of Hi-C for virus-host linkage studies in complex microbial communities.

Benchmarking↗