PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12927341

Catching oriented objects.

Abstract

We have investigated how participants match the orientation of a line, which moves on a vertical screen towards the subject. On its path to the participant, the line could disappear at several positions. Participants were instructed to put a bar on a predefined interception point on the screen, such that the bar touched the screen with the same orientation as the moving line at the very moment when the line passed through the interception point or (in case of line disappearance) when the hidden line would pass through the interception point (like in catching). Participants made significant errors for oblique orientations, but not for vertical and horizontal orientations of the moving line. These errors were small or absent when the moving line was visible all the way along its path on the screen. However, these errors became larger when the line disappeared farther away from the interception point. In the second experiment we tested whether these errors could be related to errors in visual perception of line orientation. The results demonstrate that errors in matching of the bar do not correspond to the last perceived orientation of the line, but rather to the perceived orientation of the moving line near the beginning of the movement path. This corresponds to earlier observations that participants shortly track a moving target and then make a saccadic eye movement to the interception point.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Frouke Hermens, Stan Gielen. 2003. Catching oriented objects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(03)00048-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of lumbar range of motion and functional ability scores in patients with low back pain: assessment for range of motion validity.

STUDY DESIGN: A clinical convenience sample of workers with low back problems was tested once for a variety of parameters. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the links between lumbar range of motion and scores obtained from functional evaluation tests. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although lumbar range of motion traditionally has been the standard used to determine disability for the purposes of compensation, a concern arises from the fact that a discrete physical impairment associated with low back pain and diminished range of motion often is never found. METHODS: This study involved 18 workers with chronic low back pain referred to a rehabilitation center for determination of compensation and fitness for return to work. Lumbar range of motion was precisely and accurately measured with a three-dimensional lumbar motion instrument. In addition, typical functional tests were performed for each patient. Comparisons were made between all the lumbar range of motion values and each of the functional ability scores. RESULTS: The most notable finding was the lack of significant correlation between most of the lumbar range of motion values and the functional test scores. Only 9 of a possible 144 correlations were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between lumbar range of motion measures and functional ability is weak or nonexistent. This has implications for clinical practice as it relates to disability determination for patients with chronic low back pain, and perhaps for the current impairment guidelines of the American Medical Association.

Hand Strength↗

Froment's sign.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Hand Strength↗

Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping.

Various authors have reported a small but consistent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on the maximum opening of the hand during prehension. This effect has been interpreted in various ways. In the present study, we focus on the time-course of the effect of contextual elements on grasping. The analysis presented here is based on a model for the control of the digits that uses two movement parameters (the approach parameter and the intended contact positions). These two parameters are based on different spatial attributes (flanker-target distance and target-edge position). As we assume that the perception of both attributes is veridical, there is no need for on-line corrections in the model. We show that this model predicts all time-dependent effects of the Ebbinghaus display on grasping. Human behavior can show a reduction in context effects over time without assuming an underlying shift from illusory towards veridical size information.

Hand Strength↗