PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1293522

A collaborative process and framework for nursing research.

Abstract

Currently, there is a need for outcome research in nursing practice. To facilitate practice-based research, collaboration between education and service is essential. Although a few studies have been reported in the literature on partnerships between education and service, there is a need to describe the nature of a successful collaborative research process between a university college of nursing and a medical center. Nursing leaders from a university college of nursing and a medical center developed a collaborative framework and process by which to obtain funding for research. The following elements were crucial to the framework and facilitated the research process: commitment from leaders and individuals; concentration on positive outcomes and communication between institutions and within groups; matching of individuals; consensus on issues; and adherence to deadlines. The major benefits to this partnership are the enhancement of and opportunity for intradisciplinary research. The process provides a study site for the research and prepared faculty to develop it. All of the above elements factors contribute to a collaborative working arrangement and ensure successful outcomes for future projects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C A Lengacher, P R Mabe. 1992. A collaborative process and framework for nursing research.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1293522/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Leadership and change processes in hospitals].

BACKGROUND: Successful change processes in hospitals require leaders with strong competence and personal suitability, who can develop resource efficient and creative solutions. We have investigated how division leaders handle change processes and solve problems that arise in cross-disciplinary meeting activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight division leaders at two hospitals in the same region of Norway have gone through in-depth interviews about change leadership. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Some of the division leaders were familiar with facilitating change processes and used a range of methods and tools, but the majority had limited insight into which methods would be most appropriate in the various phases of a change process. They signalised that the most difficult challenge was to handle interactions dominated by suspicion, negative interpretation, assumptions and hidden agendas. Such interplays were the most limiting factor in the development of a common understanding of demands, goals and commitment to change processes across departments and units.

Hospital Administration↗