PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12942155

Predictive toxicology in drug development.

Abstract

A critical issue in drug development remains the failure to identify toxicological problems in new chemical entities sufficiently early in development to avoid the expense of terminating drugs in late-stage clinical development. The Society of Chemical Industry's BioActive Sciences Group arranged a one-day meeting in London, United Kingdom, on February 27, 2003, devoted to progress in the development of in silico modeling and expert systems. The meeting provided an assessment of the progress that has been made in the development of models that can be used to evaluate chemical libraries at the design stage, or to predict potential toxic effects while chemical projects are still in the lead optimization stage. Although success in developing such models might reduce the number of new chemical entities progressing to clinical development, its potential for reducing the high attrition rate (approximately 50%) in late-stage (phase II and later) clinical development could produce a substantial cost saving and might also shorten the time frame of drug development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Norman. 2003. Predictive toxicology in drug development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12942155/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strategies to design pyrazolyl urea derivatives for p38 kinase inhibition: a molecular modeling study.

The p38 protein kinase is a serine-threonine mitogen activated protein kinase, which plays an important role in inflammation and arthritis. A combined study of 3D-QSAR and molecular docking has been undertaken to explore the structural insights of pyrazolyl urea p38 kinase inhibitors. The 3D-QSAR studies involved comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices (CoMSIA). The best CoMFA model was derived from the atom fit alignment with a cross-validated r (2 )(q (2)) value of 0.516 and conventional r (2) of 0.950, while the best CoMSIA model yielded a q (2) of 0.455 and r (2) of 0.979 (39 molecules in training set, 9 molecules in test set). The CoMFA and CoMSIA contour maps generated from these models provided inklings about the influence of interactive molecular fields in the space on the activity. GOLD, Sybyl (FlexX) and AutoDock docking protocols were exercised to explore the protein-inhibitor interactions. The integration of 3D-QSAR and molecular docking has proffered essential structural features of pyrazolyl urea inhibitors and also strategies to design new potent analogues with enhanced activity.

Drug Design↗