PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1294451

Organizational factors to consider when developing a certification program for hospice nurses: a Delphi survey.

C F Knight·P F Knight
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A Delphi survey of 16 national experts in hospice nursing was conducted to address the question of which organizational factors should be considered when developing a certification program for hospice nurses. The three-round survey elicited many factors to consider which were arranged by category and ranked in order of importance according to the group opinion of the panel. The means, average deviations, standard deviations, and variances for each factor were calculated. The panel showed a high degree of consensus and there was little change in ranking after the second round. The survey produced results that should be of interest to organizations concerned with developing a certification program for hospice nurses.

Explore related subjects

CertificationDelphi TechniqueEducation, Nursing, ContinuingHospicesHumansNursing Education ResearchProgram DevelopmentUnited StatesWorkforceJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C F Knight, P F Knight. 1992. Organizational factors to consider when developing a certification program for hospice nurses: a Delphi survey.. https://doi.org/10.1080/0742-969x.1992.11882731

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗