PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12950561

Pelvic floor dysfunction: a conceptual framework for collaborative patient-centred care.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor dysfunction is a disorder predominantly affecting females. It is common and undermines the quality of lives of at least one-third of adult women and is a growing component of women's health care needs. Identifying and supporting these needs is a major public health issue with a strong psychosocial and economic basis. The importance of the interdependence of mechanical, neural, endocrine and environmental factors in the development of pelvic floor dysfunction is well recognized. There is a paucity of data investigating the true prevalence, incidence, specific risk factors, poor outcome of treatment and subsequent prevention strategies for women with multiple pelvic floor symptomatology. AIM: The aim of this paper is to present a critical review of the literature on the mechanism, presentation and management of multiple symptomatology in pelvic floor dysfunction and to propose a conceptual framework by which to consider the impact and problems women with pelvic floor dysfunction face. METHODS: A comprehensive although not exhaustive literature search was carried out using medical and nursing databases BIOMED (1966-2002) NESLI (1989-2002) and EMBASE (1980-2003) CINAHL (1982-2003) and Cochrane databases using the key words 'pelvic floor dysfunction', 'incontinence (urinary and faecal)', 'genital prolapse', sexual dysfunction, 'aetiology', epidemiology' and 'treatment'. Retrospective and prospective studies and previous clinical reviews were considered for review. The articles retrieved were hand searched for further citations and referrals were made to relevant textbooks. Particular attention was paid to papers that focused on multiple pelvic floor symptoms. FINDINGS: Pelvic floor dysfunction affects women of all ages and is associated with functional problems of the pelvic floor. Pelvic floor dysfunction describes a wide range of clinical problems that rarely occur in isolation. Inaccurate knowledge, myths and misconceptions of the incidence, cause and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction abound. Given the significance of the aetiological contribution of factors such as pregnancy and obstetric trauma, ageing, hormonal status, hysterectomy and lifestyle in the development of pelvic floor disorders, the assessment, management and prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction remains a neglected part of many health care professionals educational preparation. This not only has major economic but also psychosocial implications for women, the general population and women's health care providers. A conceptual framework is also discussed that considers not only the impact and difficulties women with pelvic floor dysfunction face but also areas in which health care professionals can improve assessment and eventual treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates gaps in the current provision of women's health care services. Functional pelvic floor problems are perceived to have low priority compared with other health disorders, and treatment remains sub-optimal. Inherent in achieving and promoting better health care services for women is the need for better collaborative approaches to care. There is a need to identify and develop comprehensive interdisciplinary, multi-professional strategies that improve the assessment and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction in primary, secondary and tertiary settings. If this area of women's health care is to be improved nurses, whether community- or hospital-based, must play a front-line role in challenging and changing current practices. Education needs to be given greater priority and the development of a specialist pelvic floor nurse role explored. Such strategies could substantially influence a more effective approach to women's health care needs, result in improved treatment outcomes and liberate women from the embarrassment, social and sexual isolation, restriction to employment and leisure opportunities and potential loss of independence that multiple symptomatology can generate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kathryn Davis, Devinder Kumar. 2003. Pelvic floor dysfunction: a conceptual framework for collaborative patient-centred care.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02754.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hemorrhoidectomy: indications and risks.

Hemorrhoids are a common cause of perianal complaints and affect 1-10 million people in North-America and with similar incidence in Europe. Symptomatic hemorrhoids are associated with nutrition, inherited predisposition, retention of feces with or without chronic abuse of laxatives or diarrhea. Increased pressure and shearing force in the anal canal may lead to severe changes in topography with detachment of the hemorrhoids from the internal sphincter and fibromuscular network resulting in bleeding, itching, pain and disordered anorectal function, even incontinence. The significance of hemorrhoids for anal continence (corpus cavernosum) is recognized. In most instances, hemorrhoids are treated conservatively; the surgeon is contacted when conservative measures have failed or complications, e.g., thrombosis, have occurred. 4 degrees prolapsed internal hemorrhoids are the main indication for hemorrhoidectomy: high (Parks) or low (Milligan-Morgan) ligation with excision, closed hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson) or stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are primary treated by incision and secondary by excision. Complications after operative treatment of external thrombosed hemorrhoids are rare. After standard hemorrhoidectomy for internal hemorrhoids approximately 10% may have a complicated follow-up (bleeding, fissure, fistula, abscess, stenosis, urinary retention, soiling, incontinence); there may be concomitant disease, e.g., perianal cryptoglandular infection, causing complex fistula/abscess, which is associated with an increased risk (30-80%) for complications, e.g., incontinence. Other treatment options, e.g., sphincterotomy, anal stretch, have been accused to cause more complications, e.g., incontinence in 30-50% of cases. However, incontinence is a complex phenomenon; it is evident that an isolated single injury is normally not a sufficient cause, e.g., injury of the internal sphincter. The majority of patients may present with prior obstetric injury, perianal infection or Crohn's disease and other comorbidity. Therefore all systemic and regional disorders, causing incontinence, should be excluded before starting manometric, neurophysiological and sonographic investigations. Variation and overlap in test results, patient-, instrument- or operator-dependent factors ask for cautious interpretation. There is vast evidence that the demonstration of muscle fibers in hemorrhoidectomy specimens is a normal feature. In conclusion, standard hemorrhoidectomy with proper indication is a safe procedure. If complications occur, it is in the interest of the patient and surgeon to perform a thorough investigation.

Fecal Incontinence↗

Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and perineorrhaphy for faecal incontinence: preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy combined with perineorraphy performed for patients with genital prolapse who concomitantly suffered from faecal incontinence (FI). SETTING: Gynaecology Department, Benenden Hospital, Benenden, Kent, UK. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and December 2001, 16 patients presented with symptoms of genital prolapse and faecal incontinence. Eleven out of the 16 patients (69%) had anorectal physiological tests and endoanal ultrasound performed before surgery. All patients had sacrospinous colpopexy and perineorraphy. Simultaneous vaginal hysterectomy was performed in two patients and anterior colporrhaphy in six patients. RESULTS: The mean age was 60 years and median parity was 2. The mean operative time was 62 min (range 35-100) and the mean blood loss was 60 ml (range 30-160). The mean follow-up period was 37 months (6-65). Thirteen patients (81%) reported no faecal incontinence after surgery, and two patients (12.5%) reported improvement. One patient (6.5%) had no improvement in her symptom of faecal incontinence after surgery. None of the patients had recurrence of genital prolapse during follow up. CONCLUSION: Sacrospinous colpopexy combined with perineorraphy can help to cure symptoms of faecal incontinence associated with genital prolapse. The possible mechanisms for such a favourable result are discussed.

Fecal Incontinence↗

Which questionnaires should be used in female urology practice?

The evaluation and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders is an evolving sub-specialty in urology. Recent attention has been directed toward more rigorous evaluation of treatment efficacy and durability of female urologic procedures. Throughout the past few decades, questionnaires have emerged as important subjective instruments for evaluation. Today, practitioners must choose from a burgeoning amount of questionnaires. This staggering number of questionnaires has raised two important issues: which questionnaire should be used in a female urology practice and should more refined criteria be developed for evaluating questionnaires to make the decision easier?

Fecal Incontinence↗