PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12952176

Subunit structures in hydroxyapatite crystal development in enamel: implications for amelogenesis imperfecta.

C Robinson·R C Shore·S R Wood·S J Brookes·D A M Smith·J T Wright·S Connell·J Kirkham
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Previous freeze-etching studies of developing enamel revealed collinear arrays of spherical structures (approximately 50 nM dia) of similar width to the crystals of mature tissue. Concomitant with matrix degradation/processing, spherical structures became less distinct until, coincident with massive matrix loss, only crystal outlines were seen. More recently, using Atomic force microscopy technology, early crystals exhibited topology reminiscent of these collinear spherical structures. After matrix loss these were replaced by similarly sized bands of positive charge density on the crystal surfaces. The data suggest enamel crystals may form from mineral-matrix spherical subunits. Matrix processing may generate mineral nuclei and lead to their fusion and transformation into long apatite crystals. Support for this view derives from the appearance of short crystal segments in amelogenesis imperfecta (hypoplastic AI) or abnormally large crystals alongside 50 nM diameter spherical mineral subunits (hypomaturation AI). Mutation of matrix or processing enzymes leading to defective processing may have impaired mineral initiation, fusion, and subsequent growth.

Explore related subjects

Amelogenesis ImperfectaAnimalsCalcification, PhysiologicCrystallizationDental EnamelDurapatiteExtracellular MatrixFreeze EtchingHumansMicroscopy, Atomic ForceRatsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Robinson, R C Shore, S R Wood, S J Brookes, D A M Smith, J T Wright, S Connell, J Kirkham. 2003. Subunit structures in hydroxyapatite crystal development in enamel: implications for amelogenesis imperfecta.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12952176/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A novel missense mutation (p.P52R) in amelogenin gene causing X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta.

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a hereditary disease with abnormal dental enamel formation. Here we report a Japanese family with X-linked AI transmitted over at least four generations. Mutation analysis revealed a novel mutation (p.P52R) in exon 5 of the amelogenin gene. The mutation was detected as heterozygous in affected females and as hemizygous in their affected father. The affected sisters exhibited vertical ridges on the enamel surfaces, whereas the affected father had thin, smooth, yellowish enamel with distinct widening of inter-dental spaces. To study the pathological cause underlying the disease in this family, we synthesized the mutant amelogenin p.P52R protein and evaluated it in vitro. Furthermore, we studied differences in the chemical composition between normal and affected teeth by x-ray diffraction analysis and x-ray fluorescence analysis. We believe that these results will greatly aid our understanding of the pathogenesis of X-linked AI.

Amelogenesis Imperfecta↗
PubMed2006

The molecular etiologies and associated phenotypes of amelogenesis imperfecta.

The amelogenesis imperfectas (AIs) are a clinically and genetically diverse group of conditions that are caused by mutations in a variety of genes that are critical for normal enamel formation. To date, mutations have been identified in four genes (AMELX, ENAM, KLK4, MMP20) known to be involved in enamel formation. Additional yet to be identified genes also are implicated in the etiology of AI based on linkage studies. The diverse and often unique phenotypes resulting from the different allelic and non-allelic mutations in these genes provide an opportunity to better understand the role of these genes and their related proteins in enamel formation. Understanding the AI phenotypes also provides an aid to clinicians in directing molecular studies aimed at delineating the genetic basis underlying these diverse clinical conditions. Our current knowledge of the known mutations and associated phenotypes of the different AI subtypes are reviewed.

Amelogenesis Imperfecta↗
PubMed2006

Phenotype and enamel ultrastructure characteristics in patients with ENAM gene mutations g.13185-13186insAG and 8344delG.

OBJECTIVE: The main clinical manifestations of amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) include alteration in the quality and quantity of enamel. AI is associated with different mutations in four genes: enamelin (ENAM), amelogenin (AMGX), kallikrein (KLK4) and enamelysin (MMP-20). Seven different mutations have been identified in the enamelin gene (ENAM). DESIGN: In this paper, we describe the phenotype and ultrastructure of enamel observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in patients with two autosomal dominant (AD) mutations in the ENAM gene: g.13185-13186insAG and g.8344delG, each in one of two unrelated families. Mutations were confirmed by sequence analysis of PCR amplified products of all 10 exons and exon/intron boundaries of the ENAM gene. RESULTS: Phenotypic diversity was observed in patients with ENAM gene mutations g.13185-13186insAG with consecutive protein alteration designated as p.P422fsX488 within family 1. In the proband, the enamel of his entire dentition was chalky white with only mild local hypoplastic alteration, while the phenotypic appearance of his father's dentition was that of local hypoplastic AI. In patients with the ENAM gene mutation g.8344delG from family 2 with consecutive protein alteration designated as p.N197fsX277, generalised hypoplastic AI was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrastructural enamel changes in the patient with the autosomal dominant ENAM g.13185-13186insAG mutation, described for the first time in this study, were less pronounced compared to ultrastructural changes in patients with the autosomal dominant ENAM mutation 8344delG. Ultrastructural characteristics of the g.13185-13186insAG mutation revealed deformed prisms, an oval shape on the cross-section and wider interprism spaces, while enamel with the ENAM mutation 8344delG was laminated, but prismless.

Amelogenesis Imperfecta↗