PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12955861

Developmental skeletal anomalies.

Abstract

A genetic and molecular revolution is taking place in medicine today. Led by the Human Genome Project, genetic information and concepts are changing the way diseases are defined, diagnoses are made, and treatment strategies are developed. The profound implications of actually understanding the molecular abnormalities of many clinical problems are affecting virtually all medical and surgical disciplines. The ability to apply knowledge gleaned from the laboratory is our best hope for developing strategies to modify the pathologic effects of genes (by drug therapy), repair genes (gene therapy), and restore lost or affected tissues (tissue engineering). Instead of an empiric trial-and-error approach to therapy, it may become feasible to tailor treatment to the specific molecular malfunction. In this review we have chosen to emphasize a few selected musculoskeletal disorders, including skeletal dysplasias, spinal deformities, developmental dislocation of the hip, and idiopathic clubfoot. The logical extension of our understanding of the molecular players in many of these disorders is to establish precisely what the products of the affected genes do during skeletal development, and how mutations disturb these functions to produce the characteristic phenotype. Despite the many hypotheses generated from the work in human genetics, and the knowledge that has been gained from animal models, there remains a relatively poor understanding of how these genes interfere with skeletal development. Unraveling these mysteries and defining them in molecular and cellular terms will be the challenges for the near future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jose A Morcuende, Stuart L Weinstein. 2003. Developmental skeletal anomalies.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.10011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Severe hypertelorism, midface prominence, prominent/simple ears, severe myopia, borderline intelligence, and bone fragility in two brothers: new syndrome?

We report on two brothers, born to double first cousin Jordanian Arab parents, with a syndrome comprising severe hypertelorism with upslanted palpebral fissures, brachycephaly, abnormal ears, sloping shoulders, enamel hypoplasia, and osteopenia with repeated fractures. Both have severe myopia, mild to moderate sensori-neural hearing loss and borderline intelligence. Results of chromosome analysis were normal as was a FISH assay for subtelomeric rearrangements. The father has mild hypertelorism but the family history is otherwise unremarkable. We think that this represents a previously unrecognized autosomal or X-linked recessive syndrome.

Bone Diseases, Developmental↗

Efficacy of MRI in classifying proximal focal femoral deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of MRI in classifying PFFD and to compare MRI to radiographic classification of PFFD. DESIGN: Radiographic and MRI classification of the cases was performed utilizing the Amstutz classification system. PATIENTS: Retrospective evaluation of radiographs and MRI exams in nine hips of eight patients with proximal focal femoral deficiency was performed by two radiologists. RESULTS: The cases were classified by radiographs as Amstutz 1: n=3, Amstutz 3: n=3, Amstutz 4: n=1 and Amstutz 5: n=2. The classifications based on MRI were Amstutz 1: n=6, Amstutz 2: n=1, Amstutz 3: n=0, Amstutz 4: n=2 and Amstutz 5: n=0. Three hips demonstrated complete agreement. There were six discordant hips. In two of the discordant cases, follow-up radiographs of 6 months or greater intervals were available and helped to confirm MRI findings. Errors in radiographic evaluation consisted of overestimating the degree of deficiency. CONCLUSION: MRI is more accurate than radiographic evaluation for the classification of PFFD, particularly early on, prior to the ossification of cartilaginous components in the femurs. Since radiographic evaluation tends to overestimate the degree of deficiency, MRI is a more definitive modality for evaluation of PFFD.

Bone Diseases, Developmental↗