PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12958992

[Causality in urologic research].

Abstract

Clinical-epidemiological research may orient us about the causes of disease, the relationships among them, and the relative magnitudes of their effects. The objective of this article is to link the notion of cause with the basic clinical-epidemiological parameters. There are different models explaining causality. All of them present the possible etiologic explanations for the diseases, taking into consideration the current knowledge at the time they have been posed. We start from a purely determinist conception, understanding causality as a constant connection between two factors x and y, unique, and perfectly predictable. Currently, this model is inadequate to be applied to many diseases. Many researchers have modified the determinist model to explain the multiple causality of disease, posing the existence of associations of causal factors, more than single factors, being these associations treated as sufficient cause (i.e. as a group of minimal conditions and events that inevitably produce the disease). That determinist concept of causality is supplemented with the probabilistic concept. The theory of probability is used in it, as well as the related statistical, methods, to empirically evaluate a possible association that is believed causal. As a consequence of the lack of certainty of the prediction at the individual level, the theoretical notion of cause is replaced by the empirical concept of risk factor, referring to a variable which is considered to be related to the probability that one individual develops the disease. Causal inference in epidemiology is the logic development of a theory, based on observations and arguments that attribute the presence (association) of a disease to one or more risk factors. We will follow the principles posed by B. Hill for the complex process called scientific generalization. To correctly perform this relationship between our ideas and are observations it is absolutely important to start from a correct election of the study design with which the research is undertaken.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Miguel Carrasco Asenjo. [Causality in urologic research].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12958992/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Covariates missing by design: comparison of the efficient score to other weighted methods.

This paper addresses the modelling of missing covariate data with the logistic regression model. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the properties of an efficient score for logistic regression in a two-phase design. Simulation studies show that the efficient score is more efficient than two other pseudo-likelihood methods when the correlation between the missing covariate and its surrogate is high or the sampling proportion is small. These methods are illustrated with data from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Results from the example confirm the simulation study findings with the exception that the pseudo-likelihood approach produces more reliable estimates than the weighted pseudo-likelihood approach.

Biomedical Research↗

Tree-based model checking for logistic regression.

A tree procedure is proposed to check the adequacy of a fitted logistic regression model. The proposed method not only makes natural assessment for the logistic model, but also provides clues to amend its lack-of-fit. The resulting tree-augmented logistic model facilitates a refined model with meaningful interpretation. We demonstrate its use via simulation studies and an application to the Pima Indians diabetes data.

Biomedical Research↗

Evidence-based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson's disease with recommendations for practice and research.

Physical therapy is often prescribed in Parkinson's disease. To facilitate the uniformity and efficacy of this intervention, we analyzed current evidence and developed practice recommendations. We carried out an evidence-based literature review. The results were supplemented with clinical expertise and patient values and translated into practice recommendations, developed according to international standards for guideline development. A systematic literature search yielded 6 systematic reviews and 23 randomized controlled trials of moderate methodological quality with sufficient data. Six specific core areas for physical therapy were identified: transfers, posture, reaching and grasping, balance, gait, and physical capacity. We extracted four specific treatment recommendations that were based on evidence from more than two controlled trials: cueing strategies to improve gait; cognitive movement strategies to improve transfers; exercises to improve balance; and training of joint mobility and muscle power to improve physical capacity. These practice recommendations provide a basis for current physical therapy in Parkinson's disease in everyday clinical practice, as well as for future research in this field.

Biomedical Research↗