PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12959693

Recurrent miscarriage.

Abstract

Recurrent miscarriage is defined as the occurrence of three consecutive pregnancy losses during the first trimester. Although it affects only 1% of all couples, it is a most frustrating experience for the patient as well as for the clinician. Frustrating for the couple because they rarely obtain clear-cut reasons for the repeated failure to sustain a pregnancy, nor the prospect of a fail-safe treatment; frustrating for the clinician, too, because it is extremely difficult to disentangle the causes of sporadic and unavoidable miscarriage--most of which have a genetic background--from those of recurrent miscarriage. In the latter case, an underlying defect can potentially be detected and, ideally, should be amenable to treatment. Unfortunately, however, this is rather exceptional. In this paper, literature on genetic, anatomic, endocrine, metabolic, and autoimmune aspects of recurrent miscarriage are reviewed, and a survey of meaningful investigations and treatment is provided.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marc Dhont. 2003. Recurrent miscarriage.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12959693/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Live birth rate varies with gestational history and etiology in women experiencing recurrent spontaneous abortion.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess pregnancy outcome in relation to etiologic factors of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). STUDY DESIGN: The pregnancies from consecutive 216 RSA women were assessed for live birth rates (LBR) according to etiology. The LBR in 110 pregnancies from RSA women with unexplained etiology was investigated according to various therapies. An attempt to karyotype the abortuses was made. RESULTS: Excluding pregnancies ending in abortion with abnormal karyotype, the LBR in primary recurrent spontaneous aborters (68.8%) who experienced three or more abortions was significantly lower than that in primary repeated aborters (82.4%) who experienced two abortions. The LBR ranged from 50 to 100% according to the etiology. In RSA women with unexplained etiology, the LBR in those undergoing massive intravenous immunoglobulin (MIVIg) therapy (100%) was significantly higher than those with low dose aspirin (57.1%) and luteal support therapy (67.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Excluding pregnancies ending in abortion with abnormal karyotype, we found that LBR varied with abortion history and etiologic factors of RSA.

Abortion, Habitual↗

A comparison of the uterine and intraovarian arterial flows in nonpregnant women having a history of recurrent spontaneous miscarriage associated with antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the relationship between values of Doppler indices characterizing the uterine and intraovarian arterial flows and presence or absence of antiphospholipid syndrome in women with history of recurrent spontaneous miscarriage in the midluteal phase of unstimulated menstrual cycle. METHODS: Sixty two non pregnant women attending our recurrent spontaneous miscarriage clinic were recruited for this prospective study and subsequently divided to group A ( n=35) involving recurrent spontaneous miscarriage women with normal anticardiolipin antibodies values and group B ( n=27) for those with abnormal anticardiolipin antibodies values. Anticardiolipin antibodies were measured in the blood using the standardized enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. B-mode, pulsed, color and power Doppler transvaginal ultrasonography was used to estimate the uterine artery pulsatility index, spiral artery resistance index, intraovarian arterial resistance index and endometrial thickness on the 21st day of a regular 28-day unstimulated menstrual cycle. The data were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS 9.0 Windows. Statistical significance was defined as p</=0.05. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in values of Doppler indices characterizing uterine and intraovarian arterial flows in women having a history of recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (RSM) with presence or absence of antiphospholipid syndrome. There were a significantly higher number of women with normal anticardiolipin antibodies above 30 years having a history of six or more RSM [7 (31.8)] compared to RSM women with abnormal anticardiolipin antibodies [0 (0)] ( p<0.028). Significantly higher incidence of the primary RSM was found in group A [16 (64.0)] compared to group B [9 (36.0)] ( p</=0.02). A consistently similar difference pattern was observed between the mean intraovarian arterial resistance index value in group A primary RSM [0.54 (0.40-0.63)] compared to a more favorable mean intraovarian arterial resistance index value in group B secondary RSM [0.46 (0.43-0.58)] ( p</=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study did not confirm any statistically significant difference in values of Doppler indices characterizing uterine and intraovarian arterial flows of RSM women with presence or absence of antiphospholipid syndrome in the midluteal phase of unstimulated menstrual cycle. This finding suggests that a mild form of APS will not result in any significant impairment of angiogenesis occurring at time of implantation of fertilized ovum.

Abortion, Habitual↗

High basal estradiol level and FSH/LH ratio in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: The potential role of diminished ovarian reserve in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in a retrospective comparative analysis. METHODS: Eighty women with RPL underwent routine work-up to exclude known associations of RPL. Serum FSH, LH and E(2) levels were assessed on the 3rd day of the menstrual cycle. Following investigation, 58 women failed to reveal an identifiable cause and are therefore classified as unexplained RPL. Control group consisted of women in whom the cause of abortions was known such as uterine septum and parental chromosomal abnormalities. Mean age, gravidity, parity, presence of infertility, previous number of miscarriages, duration of marriage were similar in both groups. Day 3 serum levels of FSH, E(2) and FSH: LH ratios were compared in the two groups. RESULTS: Elevated FSH concentrations were equally distributed in the unexplained RPL and control groups. Both day 3 E(2) and FSH:LH ratio were elevated in the unexplained RPL group compared with the control group ( p=0.0066 and p=0.0187 respectively). The percentage of women with elevated FSH and/or E(2) levels on day 3 were significantly higher in the unexplained RPL group than in controls ( p=0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: Unexplained RPL may be associated with diminished ovarian reserve and should be considered in the workup of RPL.

Abortion, Habitual↗