PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1296266

["Soft" parameters and invisible resuscitation].

Abstract

Caring for a patient implies performing technical interventions and caring for the whole person, recognising his/her personal life, habits, family, wills. The working experience of an intensive care unit of Bellinzona is described: the theoretical framework that led the health team to start this new approach to intensive care patients and its translation in everyday practice. Verbal and non verbal communication skills (with the patient and the team) are pivotal in this approach; relatives are considered partners in the care of the patient and an essential element of the caring environment. Nurses identified meaningful data (soft data) related to living experience of the patient, to the interaction with the healing environment, his/her patterns of communication, and their use in the intensive care unit is described.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Martignoni, J Piazza, R Malacrida. ["Soft" parameters and invisible resuscitation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1296266/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗