PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12969921

Prospective semistructured observational study to identify risk attributable to staff deployment, training, and updating opportunities for midwives.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential risk or mishap in the system of intrapartum care, relating to the deployment of midwives. DESIGN: Prospective semistructured observational study. SETTING: Labour wards of seven maternity units in the north west of England. PARTICIPANTS: All midwives working on the labour ward during the observation period in 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: "Latent failures" within the system relating to midwifery staffing levels, deployment, and training or updating opportunities. RESULTS: Despite the exemplary dedication of midwives, potential risk of mishap due to their deployment occurred within the system of care. A shortfall of midwives existed in all seven maternity units and was most acute in the largest units. Six units relied on bank midwives to maintain minimum staffing levels. High risk practices (oxytocin administration and epidural blockades) continued during midwifery shortfalls in all units. Some adverse events and "near misses" were attributable to midwifery shortages in all units, and near misses remained unreported in all units. Uptake of opportunities for training or updating in interpretation of cardiotocographs and obstetric emergency management remained low owing to midwifery shortages in all units. A poor skill mix of midwives occurred at times in all units. In six units midwives spent time away from clinical areas performing clerical duties. In three units team midwifery systems were reported to erode labour ward skills and confidence. CONCLUSION: Midwives are fundamental components in the system of intrapartum care, and the system cannot operate safely and effectively when the number of midwives is inadequate, midwives are poorly deployed, and they are unable to engage in opportunities for training and updating.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brenda Ashcroft, Max Elstein, Nicholas Boreham, Soren Holm. 2003-09-13. Prospective semistructured observational study to identify risk attributable to staff deployment, training, and updating opportunities for midwives.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7415.584

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Accuracy of clinical assessment of infant heart rate in the delivery room.

Heart rate (HR) dictates intervention during neonatal resuscitation. Guidelines recommend that HR be assessed by auscultation or palpation. We compared HRs determined clinically with electrocardiography (ECG) in healthy newborns in the delivery room. Clinical assessment by 23 observers randomly allocated to assess HR by one of two methods in 26 infants, was found to be inaccurate and underestimate ECG HR. The mean difference between HR assessed by auscultation and palpation ECG and HR using methodology recommended by the Neonatal Resuscitation Programme was 14 and 22 beats per minute respectively.

Delivery Rooms↗