PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12970119

Thrombin interactions.

Abstract

After generation from prothrombin, thrombin plays multiple roles in the blood coagulation cascade that are mediated by interaction with a number of physiologic substrates, effectors, and inhibitors. Structural and mutagenesis studies have helped unravel the molecular basis of thrombin interactions in the context of both well-established and emerging new roles of the enzyme. The functional versatility of thrombin owes much to its evolutionary origin and results from structural determinants and mechanisms that can be exploited by pharmacologic intervention.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Enrico Di Cera. 2003. Thrombin interactions.. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.3_suppl.11s

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Why does the Ras switch "break" by oncogenic mutations?

The elucidation of the structure of the RasGAP complex provides what is perhaps the most detailed link between protein structure and cancer causing mutations. In particular, it is known that mutations of Gln 61 destroy the GTPase activity of the complex, locks the cell in its ON state and thus, can cause cancer. It is entirely unclear however, why this specific mutation is so important. The present work uncovers the elusive role of Gln 61 by computer simulation of the GTPase reaction in Ras, RasGAP and of their mutants. Simulations of the effects of mutations of Gln 61 reproduce the corresponding observed changes in activation energies and allow us to analyze the energy contributions to these effects. It is found that Gln 61 does not operate in a direct chemical way nor by a direct electrostatic or steric interaction with the transition state (TS). Instead, oncogenic mutations of Gln 61 lead to the destruction of the exquisitely preorganized catalytic configuration of the active site of the RasGAP complex. This "allosteric" effect causes a major reduction in the electrostatic stabilization of the TS. Our findings have general relevance to other proteins that control signal transduction processes.

Allosteric Site↗

Gating allosterism at a single class of etomidate sites on alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA A receptors accounts for both direct activation and agonist modulation.

At clinical concentrations, the potent intravenous general anesthetic etomidate enhances gamma-aminobutyric acid, type A (GABA(A)) receptor activity elicited with low gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations, whereas much higher etomidate concentrations activate receptors in the absence of GABA. Therefore, GABA(A) receptors may possess two types of etomidate sites: high affinity GABA-modulating sites and low affinity channel-activating sites. However, GABA modulation and direct activation share stereoselectivity for the (R)(+)-etomidate isomer and display parallel dependence on GABA(A) beta subunit isoforms, suggesting that these two actions may be mediated by a single class of etomidate site(s) that exert one or more molecular effects. In this study, we assessed GABA modulation by etomidate using leftward shifts of electrophysiological GABA concentration responses in cells expressing human alpha1beta2gamma2L receptors. Etomidate at up to 100 microm reduced GABA EC(50) values by over 100-fold but without apparent saturation, indicating the absence of high affinity etomidate sites. In experiments using a partial agonist, P4S, etomidate both reduced EC(50) and increased maximal efficacy, demonstrating that etomidate shifts the GABA(A) receptor gating equilibrium toward open states. Results were quantitatively analyzed using equilibrium receptor gating models, wherein a postulated class of equivalent etomidate sites both directly activates receptors and enhances agonist gating. A Monod-Wyman-Changeux co-agonist mechanism with two equivalent etomidate sites that allosterically enhance GABA(A) receptor gating independently of agonist binding most simply accounts for direct activation and agonist modulation. This model also correctly predicts the actions of etomidate on GABA(A) receptors containing a point mutation that increases constitutive gating activity.

Allosteric Site↗

Structure of an allosteric inhibitor of LFA-1 bound to the I-domain studied by crystallography, NMR, and calorimetry.

LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1) plays a role in intercellular adhesion and lymphocyte trafficking and activation and is an attractive anti-inflammatory drug target. The alpha-subunit of LFA-1, in common with several other integrins, has an N-terminally inserted domain (I-domain) of approximately 200 amino acids that plays a central role in regulating ligand binding to LFA-1. An additional region, termed the I-domain allosteric site (IDAS), has been identified exclusively within the LFA-1 I-domain and shown to regulate the function of this protein. The IDAS is occupied by small molecule LFA-1 inhibitors when cocrystallized or analyzed by (15)N-(1)H HSQC (heteronuclear single-quantum coherence) NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) titration experiments. We report here a novel arylthio inhibitor that binds the I-domain with a K(d) of 18.3 nM as determined by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). This value is in close agreement with the IC(50) (10.9 nM) derived from a biochemical competition assay (DELFIA) that measures the level of inhibition of binding of whole LFA-1 to its ligand, ICAM-1. Having established the strong affinity of the arylthio inhibitor for the isolated I-domain, we have used a range of techniques to further characterize the binding, including ITC, NMR, and X-ray crystallography. We have first developed an effective ITC binding assay for use with low-solubility inhibitors that avoids the need for ELISA-based assays. In addition, we utilized a fast NMR-based assay for the generation of I-domain-inhibitor models. This is based around the collection of HCCH-TOCSY spectra of LFA-1 in the bound form and the identification of a subset of side chain methyl groups that give chemical shift changes upon binding of LFA-1 inhibitors. This subset was used in two-dimensional (13)C-(15)N and (15)N-filtered and -edited two-dimensional NMR experiments to identify a minimal set of intraligand and ligand-protein NOEs, respectively (nuclear Overhauser enhancements). Models from the NMR data were assessed by comparison to an X-ray crystallographic structure of the complex, confirming that the method correctly predicted the essential features of the bound ligand.

Allosteric Site↗