PubMed · 12996521
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P J ALEXANDER. Clinical laboratory audit.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12996521/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A survey of practices in a primary care group in outer London found many were poorly prepared for implementing clinical governance. More than half consisted of one doctor, and a quarter of practices were not computerised. Only a third had a staff development plan. Only a minority had sought patients' views about new services. Although three-quarters of practices were using guidelines, few had been trained in the use of protocols and guidelines.
In clinical practice we formulate direct questions related to patient management that should be answered on the basis of results of valid studies. Bias problems are dealt with using different approaches in observational studies and in clinical trials. The clinical trial is the standard for assessing the efficacy of treatments while the efficiency of treatments at community level is better captured by observational studies. Electronic medical records have now emerged as a precious, matchless data source for clinical audits. The value of an audit cannot be taken for granted and should be tested in the specific health care setting where it is applied. Electronic medical records and high quality clinical databases offer a great opportunity for performing observational studies and for reducing the cost of clinical trials. Research on audit and feedback functionality is a new, useful and stimulating research area which may be of great interest to nephrologists.